Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provisional fix for wind stress limit error #50

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2022

Conversation

jbusecke
Copy link
Contributor

@jbusecke jbusecke commented Oct 4, 2022

Currently aerobulk has limit of 5N/m^2 hardcoded. As discussed here we can probably update that value to at least 10N/m^2.

I have submitted a PR upstream to increase the limit.

This PR is swapping the submodule pointer from the upstream main repo to my personal PR branch (this SO post was very helpful) to implement this fix in our code base ASAP. As soon as this is fixed upstream, we should repoint to the official aerobulk repo.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 90.03% // Head: 90.03% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (d1ea501) compared to base (3fd7316).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #50   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.03%   90.03%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         251      251           
=======================================
  Hits          226      226           
  Misses         25       25           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.03% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant