Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[charter] SustyWeb IG charter should coordinate with IETF environmental efforts #121

Closed
tantek opened this issue Oct 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
technical Corrections, bugs, or minor omissions
Milestone

Comments

@tantek
Copy link
Member

tantek commented Oct 12, 2024

The SustyWeb IG charter Coordination section says: “We will also monitor the work of and where appropriate collaborate with standards bodies (external to the W3C) such as those listed below…” and then lists two organizations.

The IETF should be added to this list of standards bodies, perhaps even their Environmental Impacts of Internet Technology (eimpact) group in particular.

The aspects of coordination could include each group’s email lists, meetings, and perhaps even collaborating on documents.

If it would help, I could start a Pull Request with a basic one-sentence group and coordination description, and invite the editor(s) to make further changes as necessary.

(Originally published at: https://tantek.com/2024/285/b2/)

AlexDawsonUK added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2024
@AlexDawsonUK AlexDawsonUK self-assigned this Oct 12, 2024
@AlexDawsonUK AlexDawsonUK added the technical Corrections, bugs, or minor omissions label Oct 12, 2024
@AlexDawsonUK AlexDawsonUK added this to the v1.0-D9 milestone Oct 12, 2024
@AlexDawsonUK
Copy link
Member

Agreed, I'm a member of the IETF eImpact community as are a few of our contributors so it was an omission not to include this! I've added it into the list as requested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
technical Corrections, bugs, or minor omissions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants