Proposal sketch in Markdown for discussion #103
Conversation
|
(Nitpick: you can make this a draft PR so it's clear it's not to be merged, the merge affordances don't show, etc.) |
Added section labels, as per #102 (comment).
| To build a better future, the W3C must rise even further to the challenge of improving the Web's fundamental integrity, | ||
| while continuing to expand the Web’s scope and reach. | ||
| We must embody in our work the core values of the Web itself, | ||
| by supporting the Ethical Web Principles with Operational Principles of the W3C. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there a reason why calling them "Operational Principles" as opposed to the broader and simpler "principles"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The point was to distinguish that these ARE supposed to be the operating principles of the W3C organization - not principles of the Web. Perhaps it should be Organizational Principles.
| by being inclusive, principled, and continually striving to make the Web better through these principles and the Ethical Web Principles. | ||
| As the Ethical Web Principles state, “The web should empower an equitable, informed and interconnected society.” | ||
|
|
||
| ## Operational Principles of the W3C |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unless there's a good reason, I'd like it better if it were titled "Principles" [of W3C|of the World Wide Web Consortium] instead of "Operational Principles [...]".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I'm liking this direction quite a bit; while I'm still digesting it (and #104), some concrete feedback on the text.
|
Note that this is superceded by #111 . |
|
should I bring my comments that still apply to #111? |
|
@dontcallmedom I am SO so sorry. I forgot to incorporate your comments here (and this is exactly how I wanted commentary). I've done so now - read through your comments above, and you can see the disposition. |
|
thanks a lot! I've marked as resolved the comments that have been integrated, and will try to do another pass with comments/issues for the remaining ones |
* Rewrite proposal. * add line introing op principles inspired by #104. * Tweaked per Dom's comments in #103. * One more tweak per Dom's guidance in #103 * Remove "The" in front of W3C. Man, I hate the way this sounds, but it is correct. Co-authored-by: Chris Needham <[email protected]> * separate SDOs and government relationships Co-authored-by: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <[email protected]> * "Growing impact" As per comment in #104 * "respectful" As per comment in #104 (comment) * Oxford comma * Re-added "We put the needs of users first" * Remove "must" in one instance * Re-add consensus-building point. * "We are" for consistency * Remove "ethical" from mission statement * Go back to "respectful" * Remove duplicate text, move "stakeholders" to separate bullet * final tweak to intro/purpose as per thread with @fantasai --------- Co-authored-by: Chris Needham <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <[email protected]>
No description provided.