👋 Hello @Burhan-Q, thank you for submitting an ultralytics/ultralytics 🚀 PR! This is an automated response, and an Ultralytics engineer will also assist you soon. To ensure a seamless integration of your work, please review the following checklist:

• ✅ Define a Purpose: Clearly explain the purpose of your change in the PR description, and link to any relevant issues. Ensure your commit messages are clear, concise, and adhere to the project's conventions.
• ✅ Synchronize with Source: Confirm your PR is synchronized with the ultralytics/ultralytics main branch. If it's behind, update it by clicking the 'Update branch' button or by running git pull and git merge main locally.
• ✅ Ensure CI Checks Pass: Verify all Ultralytics Continuous Integration (CI) checks are passing. If any checks fail, please address the issues.
• ✅ Update Documentation: Update the relevant documentation for any new or modified features.
• ✅ Add Tests: If applicable, include or update tests to cover your changes, and confirm that all tests are passing.
• ✅ Sign the CLA: Please ensure you have signed our Contributor License Agreement if this is your first Ultralytics PR by writing "I have read the CLA Document and I sign the CLA" in a new message.
• ✅ Minimize Changes: Limit your changes to the minimum necessary for your improvement. "It is not daily increase but daily decrease, hack away the unessential. The closer to the source, the less wastage there is." — Bruce Lee

For more guidance, please refer to our Contributing Guide. If your PR addresses a bug, please include a minimum reproducible example (MRE) to assist with verification.

Thank you for contributing to Ultralytics! We appreciate your efforts and look forward to reviewing your improvements. 🚀😊

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.96%. Comparing base (e0f8eda) to head (57c1a4e).

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16750      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.01%   73.96%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         128      128              
  Lines       17138    17134       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        12684    12674      -10     
- Misses       4454     4460       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Burhan-Q this might not be a bad idea! Let's try it!

@Burhan-Q oh but wait, then with this change we'll have a super fast backwards pass time showing in the profiling, so we actually want an NaN to show here if the operation has no backwards pass.

Updated to time_sync() if backward pass is successful or float("nan") otherwise

Thank you for the update! Using time_sync() for successful backward passes and float("nan") otherwise is a clean and efficient solution to ensure accurate profiling while maintaining clarity in the results.