-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VR: extend to verify some cstr benchmarks #66
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is quite big PR. I will need some assistance to fully understand the changes.
@@ -0,0 +1,17959 @@ | |||
/* | |||
* Catch v2.13.7 | |||
* Generated: 2021-07-28 20:29:27.753164 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file is generated. Should it really be versioned in Git?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe I wanted to add it properly as a dependency, but I think the problem was that the CMake version does not support FetchContent (and my knowledge of CMake is too limited to be able to do it otherwise), so I added the one necessary file manually. I believe it is done in the same way in tests for dg.
This are the commits from svcomp22 branch right? Don't know how much they are polished, but they have been quite well tested as they were used in SV-COMP 22. Also, I do not know how much @GiraffeReversed will react on any request for changes, so maybe they are good to be merged as they are? (maybe with some cosmetic changes). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't went through the commits, but I have tested them repeatedly (and they ran in SV-COMP'22), so once all cosmetic issues are solved, I think they are good to be merged. Sorry that they are not in the svcomp22 branch, but apparently I haven't pushed the final state of the branch to github...
Hi :) I don't really know what the requested cosmetic changes are... (but hopefully I am able to perform them after the exam period). |
Tested on SV-COMP21_valid-memsafety category, changed no answers except for newly verified benchmarks.
Depends on VR: use fixed and refactored version #65.