-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 709
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP:Feature/arm64 simd support #414
Open
tdermendjiev
wants to merge
12
commits into
libffi:master
Choose a base branch
from
tdermendjiev:feature/simd_matrix_support
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
WIP:Feature/arm64 simd support #414
tdermendjiev
wants to merge
12
commits into
libffi:master
from
tdermendjiev:feature/simd_matrix_support
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…/libffi into feature/simd_matrix_support # Conflicts: # include/ffi.h.in # src/aarch64/ffi.c
…ix_support # Conflicts: # testsuite/Makefile.am
tdermendjiev
changed the title
Feature/arm64 simd support
WIP:Feature/arm64 simd support
Mar 16, 2018
tdermendjiev
force-pushed
the
feature/simd_matrix_support
branch
from
March 20, 2018 09:41
bb634af
to
e2acfa5
Compare
tdermendjiev
force-pushed
the
feature/simd_matrix_support
branch
from
March 21, 2018 15:54
e2acfa5
to
0841fd8
Compare
Important discussion here: https://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2018/msg00020.html |
11 tasks
I found this PR while working on adding support for SIMD types to PyObjC. Are there any plans to merging this functionality? |
Also related to #773 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Current implementation of libffi doesn't handle ext_vector values properly on Aarch64. New ffi type = FFI_TYPE_EXT_VECTOR is introduced in order for ffi_call function to be able to distinguish between standard collection types (marked as FFI_TYPE_STRUCT) and ext_vector ones as ext_vector values are not being stored in general-purpose registers.