This is a small skeleton to create Snakemake workflows. Snakemake "is a workflow management system that aims to reduce the complexity of creating workflows by providing a fast and comfortable execution environment, together with a clean and modern specification language in python style."

The idea is to create a workflow with of snakefiles, resolve dependencies with conda, pip, tarballs, and if there is no other option, docker.

Follow the contents of the .travis.yml file:

1. Install (ana|mini)conda

   • Anaconda

   • miniconda

2. Installation

   git clone https://github.com/jlanga/smsk.git smsk
   cd smsk
   conda --use-conda --create-envs-only

3. Execute the test pipeline:

   snakemake --use-conda -j

4. Modify the following files:

   • samples.yml with info on your samples,
   • cluster.yml (optional) with run time and memory of the intensive tasks.

5. Run the pipeline with your data

   snakemake --use-conda -j

6. (Optional) Run the pipeline inside a Docker container:

   bash src/run_docker.sh

The hierarchy of the folder is the one described in Good enough practices in scientific computing:

smsk
├── cluster.yml: info on memory and running time of certain jobs.
├── data: raw data or links to backup data.
├── doc: documentation.
├── reports: reports generated by this example.
├── README.md
├── results: processed data.
├── Snakefile: driver script of the project. Mostly links to src/snakefiles.
└── src: project's source code, snakefiles tarballs, scripts for the lazy.

• The workflow should be written in the main Snakefile and all the subworkflows in src/snakefiles.

• Split into different snakefiles as much as possible. This way code supervision is more bearable and you can recycle them for other projects.

• Start each rule name with the name of the subworkflow (map): map_bowtie, map_sort, map_index.

• Use a Snakefile to store all the folder names instead of typing them explicitelly (bin/snakefiles/folders.py), and using variables with the convention SUBWORKFLOW_NAME: map_bwa_sample, map_sort_sample, etc.

• End a workflow with a checkpoint rule: a rule that takes as input the result of the workflow (map). Use the subworkflow name as a folder name to store its results: map results go into results/map/.

• Log everything. Store it next to the results: rule/name_wildcards.log. Store also benchmarks. Consider even creating a subfolder if the total number of files is too high.

• End it also with a clean rule that deletes everything of the workflow (clean_map).

• Use the bin/snakefiles/raw to get/link your raw data, databases, etcetera. You should be careful when cleaning this folder.

• Configuration for software, samples, etcetera, should be written in config files (instead of hardcoding them somewhere in a 1000 line script). Command line software usually comes with mandatory parameters and optional ones. Ideally, write the mandatory ones in each snakefile and the optional in the config files.

• In the same way that in Bioconductor datasets are split into three different tables (experimental, sample and feature data), we should do the same:

  • sample.yml: information about your samples: library names, paths to fastq files, type of sequencing, ...

  • features.yml: information about the reference genome, transcriptome, annotation, ...

  • params.yml: non-default parameters of each one of the programs we are using: number of maximum threads, compression levels of samtools, quality thresholds for trimmomatic, ...

  • cluster.yml: information about how to execute in the cluster environment each of the rules: how many threads and how much memory.

• shell.prefix("set -euo pipefail;") in the first line of the Snakefile makes the entire workflow to stop in case of even a warning or a exit error different of 0. Maybe not necessary anymore (2016/12/13).

• If compressing, use pigz, pbzip2 or pxz instead of gzip. Get them from conda.

• Install as many possible packages from conda and pip instead of using apt/apt-get: software is more recent, and you don't have to unzip tarballs or rely on your sysadmin. This way your workflow is more reproducible. The problem I see with brew is that you cannot specify an exact version.

• To install software from tarballs, download them into src/ and copy binaries to bin/ (and write the steps in bin/install/from_tarball.sh):

  # Binaries are already compiled
  wget \
      --continue \
      --output-document src/bin1.tar.gz \
      http://bin1.com/bin1.tar.gz
  tar xvf src/bin1.tar.gz
  cp src/bin1/bin1 bin/ # or link
  
  # Tarball contains the source
  wget \
      --continue \
      --output-document src/bin2.tar.gz \
      http://bin2.com/bin2.tar.gz
  tar xvf src/bin2.tar.gz
  pushd src/bin2/
  make -j
  cp build/bin2 ../../bin/

• Use as much as possible temp() and protected() so you save space and also protect yourself from deleting everything.

• Pipe and compress as much as possible. Make use of the process substitution feature in bash: cmd <(gzip -dc fa.gz) and cmd >(gzip -9 > file.gz). The problem is that it is hard to estimate the CPU usage of each step of the workflow.

• End each subworkflow with a report for your own sanity. Or write the rules in bin/snakefiles/report. Make use of all the tools that multiqc supports.

• Use in command line applications long flags (wget --continue $URL): this way it is more readable. The computer does not care and is not going to work slower.

• If software installation is too complex, consider pulling a docker image.

• A Quick Guide to Organizing Computational Biology Projects

• Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine