Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFC 7231: Include definition of status code 308 #3

Closed
reschke opened this issue Apr 20, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

RFC 7231: Include definition of status code 308 #3

reschke opened this issue Apr 20, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels
semantics

Comments

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Apr 20, 2015

...currently defined in RFC 7538.
@reschke reschke changed the title Include definition of status code 308 RFC7231: Include definition of status code 308 Apr 20, 2015
@reschke reschke changed the title RFC7231: Include definition of status code 308 RFC 7231: Include definition of status code 308 Apr 20, 2015
@mnot mnot added the semantics label Jun 20, 2017
@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Jun 5, 2018

This would obsolete 7538?

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

reschke commented Jun 5, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Yes.

Now the good question is how much of RFC 7538 include. My proposal would be just to include parts of https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7538.html#rfc.section.3, but to point back to RFC 7538 for additional information (non-normatively).

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Jun 29, 2018

Seems reasonable to me.

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

reschke commented Jun 29, 2018

Maybe we should also add the table from https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7538.html#rfc.section.1 somewhere.

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Jul 1, 2018

Possibly at the top of the 3xx section.

reschke added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2018
@reschke
import status code 308 from RFC 7538 - work in progress (#3)
b3ac2e2
reschke added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2018
@reschke
further tune discussion of 308 and fix internal reference from 301 (#3)
b5aa18f
reschke added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2018
@reschke
fix typo (#3)
4543e93
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
semantics
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mnot @reschke