Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add partial role support for manager only using web-vault v2024.12.0 #5219

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator

@BlackDex BlackDex commented Nov 21, 2024

  • Add the custom role which replaces the manager role
  • Added mini-details endpoint used by v2024.12.0

These changes try to add the custom role in such a way that it stays compatible with the older manager role. It will convert a manager role into a custom role, and if a manager has access-all rights, it will enable the correct custom roles. Upon saving it will convert these back to the old format.

What this does is making sure you are able to revert back to an older version of Vaultwarden without issues. This way we can support newer web-vault's and still be compatible with a previous Vaultwarden version if needed.

In the future this needs to be changed to full role support though.

@BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

BlackDex commented Nov 21, 2024

This PR needs a web-vault built from this PR dani-garcia/bw_web_builds#186
I'm have yet to fix the CSS, since it now still hides some elements which need to be visible.

But it would be nice if some people are able to test this PR using a web-vault built from the PR linked above.

@tessus
Copy link
Contributor

tessus commented Nov 21, 2024

In the future this needs to be changed to full role support though.

May I suggest to add more comments to the code, where your changes from this PR have to be reverted when full role support is implemented. Unless you you'll keep the compat layer even then.

It is quite possible to forget to remove/change current code/behavior when the "future" changes are not close to this PR. Please ignore, if I am way off.

@BlackDex BlackDex force-pushed the mngr-custom-role branch 2 times, most recently from ae62f5b to 6e337c6 Compare November 22, 2024 19:40
@BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tessus done :)

@stefan0xC I have fixed the icon in the collapsed menu.

@BlackDex BlackDex force-pushed the mngr-custom-role branch 2 times, most recently from de0b54c to 0a4ffc7 Compare November 25, 2024 15:58
@BlackDex BlackDex marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2024 16:23
@BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

BlackDex commented Nov 25, 2024

As mentioned before, this PR needs a new web-vault version for which a PR can be found here:

CI builds of this web-vault can be downloaded here:

@tessus
Copy link
Contributor

tessus commented Dec 6, 2024

If this is the only PR required for the new web vault, is it possible to merge this and then release the new web vault - maybe this weekend?
I've been running it (and the web vault from the artifact link) for a few days now and didn't run into any issues. Although I am sure I haven't tested all edge cases and every single functionality.

@BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

BlackDex commented Dec 7, 2024

I'd rather first fix a native client issue and release a version and after that merge this.

I also think it is better to first release the web-vault and then add that release to this PR.

@dfunkt
Copy link
Contributor

dfunkt commented Dec 7, 2024

Not sure if this belongs here or in the web vault PR, but I seem to be offered the option to log in with a passkey (which obviously doesn't work):
image

@BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

BlackDex commented Dec 7, 2024

Not sure if this belongs here or in the web vault PR, but I seem to be offered the option to log in with a passkey (which obviously doesn't work):

Thanks! I fixed it just now.

@dfunkt
Copy link
Contributor

dfunkt commented Dec 7, 2024

Now that I think about it, shouldn't the create account line also be hidden? I have signups disabled.

@BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

BlackDex commented Dec 7, 2024

Now that I think about it, shouldn't the create account line also be hidden? I have signups disabled.

Also fixed now :)

@BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm checking to see if we can update to v2024.12.0. There seem to be some minor changes and some endpoints added.

@BlackDex BlackDex changed the title Add partial role support for manager only Add partial role support for manager only using web-vault v2024.12.0 Dec 11, 2024
@BlackDex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Code is adjusted to support v2024.12.0 now. Not too much changed.

@BlackDex BlackDex force-pushed the mngr-custom-role branch 3 times, most recently from add5fbe to a16668a Compare December 14, 2024 14:20
- Add the custom role which replaces the manager role
- Added mini-details endpoint used by v2024.11.1

These changes try to add the custom role in such a way that it stays compatible with the older manager role.
It will convert a manager role into a custom role, and if a manager has `access-all` rights, it will enable the correct custom roles.
Upon saving it will convert these back to the old format.

What this does is making sure you are able to revert back to an older version of Vaultwarden without issues.
This way we can support newer web-vault's and still be compatible with a previous Vaultwarden version if needed.

In the future this needs to be changed to full role support though.

Fixed the 2FA hide CSS since the order of options has changed

Signed-off-by: BlackDex <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BlackDex <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BlackDex <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants