Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip raw blueprint from OpenAPI generating #37

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

greyli
Copy link
Member

@greyli greyli commented Apr 29, 2021

Some extension will create the blueprint, APIFlask needs to skip them when generating the OpenAPI spec file.

Checklist:

  • Add tests that demonstrate the correct behavior of the change. Tests should fail without the change.
  • Run pytest and tox, no tests failed.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 29, 2021

Deploy preview for apiflask ready!

Built with commit 4413432

https://deploy-preview-37--apiflask.netlify.app

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #37 (4413432) into master (dcf8a61) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #37   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           14        14           
  Lines          790       790           
  Branches       146       146           
=========================================
  Hits           790       790           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
apiflask/app.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
apiflask/route.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update dcf8a61...4413432. Read the comment docs.

@greyli greyli merged commit 499d693 into master Apr 29, 2021
@greyli greyli deleted the skip-blueprint branch April 29, 2021 06:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants