A200722 Gonzalez
A200722 Gonzalez
A200722 Gonzalez
ABSTRACT
José M. González-Jiménez1,2,*, Ivanina Sergeeva3, Thomas N. Kerestedjian3, Fernando Gervilla1,2
1
Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra, ABSTRACT RESUMEN
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científi-
cas (CSIC)-Universidad de Granada, Avda.
de las Palmeras 4, 18100, Armilla, Granada, Spherules are documented in ophiol- Rocas del manto superior ofiolitico tales
Spain. itic mantle rocks such as peridotites como peridotitas y cromititas contienen esfe-
and associated chromitites. They ras. Estas consisten de: (1) hierro native con
2
Departamento de Mineralogía y Petrología, consist of: (1) native iron having cantidades variables de Ni con y sin inclu-
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Grana-
da, Avda. Fuentenueva s/n, 18002, Granada, variable amounts of Ni with/without siones de vidrio silicatdo y óxidos (wüstite),
Spain. inclusions of silicate glass or oxides (2) intercrecimientos dendríticos de óxidos
(wüstite), (2) dendritic intergrowth of (magnetita, wüstita y hematites) con o sin
3
Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of oxides (magnetite, wüstite and hema- vidrio silicatado y, (2) vidrio silicatado.
Sciences, 24 Georgi Bonchev Str., 1113, Sofia,
Bulgaria. tite) with/without silicate glass and, Unísonamente, estas esferulas se interpretan
(3) silicate glass. Consensually, they como indígenas a las cromititas y relacio-
* Corresponding author: (J.M. González- are interpreted as indigenous to chro- nadas con procesos de alta temperatura que
Jiménez) [email protected] mitites and related with high-tem- tienen lugar en el manto superior terrestre.
perature processes operating in the Sin embargo, su parecido con aquellas esferas
Earth’s upper mantle. However, their de origen terrestre y extraterrestre descritas en
similarity with terrestrial and extra- otros contextos geológicos es reseñable. En
terrestrial spherules found in other este trabajo cuestionamos el origen autóc-
settings of the geological record is tono de las esferas en las rocas mantélicas,
remarkable. We raise the question on interpretándolas como material de origen
such indigenous origin, relating them volcánico y cósmico que ha sido reciclado
to volcanic and cosmic material recy- atraves de la cuña de manto superior donde
Metallic-oxide-silicate spherules are also found rial was inspected under a binocular microscope
in mantle rocks (peridotites and chromitites) from at each step of the separation process and no
a few ophiolites (Bai et al., 2004; Robinson et al., spherules were detected at this stage. Each frac-
2004; Xu et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2015; Yang et al. tion was subsequently separated by granulometry
2015; Griffin et al., 2016), although its origin is using 200 mesh disposable sieves while the frac-
highly controversial. They are interpreted to from tion 70-100 µm was again checked for spherules,
within mantle itself by melt immiscibility under although they were not identified. The chromite
the highly reducing conditions (e.g., Griffin et al., fractions were further treated with a mixture of
2016; Xiong et al., 2017) or to be solid products HF and HCl acid, heated to 160° C. The insoluble
of molten droplets originated by lightning strikes residue was then washed with deionized water sev-
on the mantle rocks when exposed to Earth’s sur- eral times and dried at room temperature reveal-
face (Ballhaus et al., 2017). Here we provide the ing the presence of spherules when recognized
first-ever thoughtful comparative study of metal- under binocular microscope. Once recognized,
lic-oxide-silicate spherules from ophiolitic upper the spherules were hand-picked and sticked on a
mantle rocks with others present in the geological wire of carbon tape on a SEM pin stub holder to
record, raising the possibility that they could cor- be imaged under scanning electron microscopy.
respond to recycled airborne spherules of cosmic Subsequent to this preliminary analysis of the
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a200722
ANALYTICAL METHODS
spherule surface, then they were imbibed in 2.4. ELECTRON MICROPROBE ANALYSIS (EPMA)
epoxy resin and polished. Considering the small
size and their softness, the largest iron spherule The major element composition of magnetite
identified from the Yakovitsa chromitite was the was determined on the polished surface for the
only to survive the polishing process. Spherule 1 using a Cameca SX-100 microprobe
in CIC of University of Grana, Spain.
2.2. FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON EPMA data were obtained using an excitation
MICROSCOPY (FE-SEM) voltage of 20 kVand a beamcurrent of 20 nA, with
a beam 2–3 μm in diameter. Monitored spectral
Spherules were preliminarily characterized and lines were MgKα, FeKa, AlKα, CrKα, SiKα,
imaged using a Leo Gemini Field Emission TiKα, MnKα, NiKα, CoKα, ZnKα and VKα.
Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM) at the Standards used were MgO, Fe2O3, Al2O3, Cr2O3,
Centro de Instrumentación Científica (CIC) of SiO2, CoO, ZnO, TiO2, MnTiO3, NiO and
the Universidad de Granada, Spain. The instru- Pb5(VO4)3Cl.
ment was equipped with an Energy Dispersive
Spectra (EDS) detector. Accelerating voltage was 2.5. FOCUSED ION BEAM (FIB) HIGH-RESOLUTION
20 kV and beam current optimized for an ade- TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY (HRTEM)
quate number of counts for each EDS analysis.
The unpolished spherules were firstly inspected A thin-foil sample was prepared and extracted
on the secondary electron mode (SE) in an effort from the polished Spherule-1 from the Yakovitsa
to better define their morphological characteris- chromitite by using a Focused Ion Beam Scanning
tics and chemistry by EDX, where once polished Electron Microscope (FIB-SEM) in the Labora-
they were checked again under FESEM but torio de Microscopías Avanzadas (LMA) at the
using the back-scattered electron mode (BSE), Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón (INA) – Uni-
although only one of the spherules survived (i.e., versity of Zaragoza, Spain. The TEM thin foil
Spherule 1 from Yakovitsa shown in Figure 2 of preparation was performed using a Dual Beam
the main text). FEI Thermo-Fisher Scientific, model Helios
650. The selected region of interest was first cov-
2.3. MICRO-RAMAN ered by a thin strip (~300 nm) of C by focused
amorphization until a final thin foil thickness of A FEI Titan G2 transmission electron microscope
~90 nm was attained. Subsequently, the thin foil (TEM) equipped with Field Emission gun XFEG
was undercut with a 30 kV at 2.5 nA current, lifted was used to analyze the thin-foil at the Centro de
out, and transferred from the sample to a TEM Instrumentation Científica of the University of
grid using an OmniProbe nano-manipulator with Granada, Spain. The FEI Titan G2 microscope
a tungsten tip. To weld the thin foil to the tungsten is equipped with 4 energy dispersive analyses of
tip and the TEM grid, an ion-beam assisted Pt X-rays (EDX) detectors (FEI microanalysis Super
deposition was performed. X) and a high-angle annular dark-field detector
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a200722
RESULTS
sampled within the thin-foil were imaged by the were recovered from two chromitites bodies hosted
FEI Titan G2 microscope using a combination of in the upper mantle section the Golyamo Kamen-
high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) to obtain yane and Yakovitsa ultramafic massifs, in southern
Z high contrast images, and High-Resolution Bulgaria (Figure 1). These rocks belong to the
Transmission Electron (HRTEM) images to char- Rhodopean Ophiolite Association (Kolcheva et al.,
acterize the texture of the grains and to properly 2000), which correspond to a lithospheric section
define the ordering of the mineral aggregates. formed a mid-oceanic ridge that evolved to an
All these images were treated using the Digital island arc/back-arc setting in a supra-subduction
Micrograph® software in its Version 1.71.38 while zone (Colás et al., 2013).
maps were processed with the VELOX® software The largest iron-rich oxide spherule (~75-175
package. The FEI Titan G2 was running at 300 µm) was found in the Yakovitsa chromitite (Figure
kV working conditions while HRTEM images 2a-2l). It consists of an interlocking polygonal struc-
were acquired using Gatan CCD Camera. Ele- ture made up of micro-crystallites of magnetite
mental maps images were also processed using the with junctions, which are filled by a finely-grained
VELOX® software. symplectite of magnetite and amporphous Si glass
Figure 1 Simplified geological map of the Eastern Rhodope (adapted from Bonev, 2006) showing the localization of the ultramafic
massifs hosting the chromitite bodies investigated in this work. Equivalence keys: 1 (Kozhoukharov et al., 1988), 2 (Haydoutov et al.,
2001), 3 (Bonev, 2006), and 4 (Janák et al., 2011). Legends are in all cases inset in the figures.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a200722
with trace amounts of P (Figure 2a-2l). Single-spot EDX analysis collected from the spherule surface
analyses obtained by EMPA show relatively (Figures 3d-3f). The discrete crystals of magnetite
RESULTS
homogenous composition of magnetite across the are small (<5 µm) faceted-equant grains with cubic
whole sphere with up to 93.47 wt.% FeOt, minor arrangement perpendicular to (111) crystal faces
Mn (0.54-0.61 wt%), CoO (0.14-0.17 wt%), Cr2O3 (Figure 3b), whereas rosaries of sub-micrometric
(0.03-0.16 wt%), Al2O3 (0.03–0.05 wt%), NiO spherules of magnetite occur widespread in the
(0.01-0.06 wt%), SiO2 (<0.5 wt%), and no TiO2, wüstite groundmass (Figure 3c).
MgO or CaO (Table 1). The smaller iron-rich oxide The glassy spherules are both colorless with
spherule identified in Golyamo Kamenyane (Fig- a smooth surface (Figures 4a and 4b) relatively
ures 3a-3c) consists of dendritic magnetite (Fe2O3) homogenous in composition dominated by SiO2
microcrystals within a wüstite (FeO) groundmass (~41 wt.%), CaO (31-34 wt-%) and Al2O3 (14-15
as determined by micro-RAMAN and FESEM- wt%), and lesser amounts of FeOt (~7 wt.%), MgO
Subducted iron and glassy spherules in the upper mantle?
Figure 2 Microphotographs of the iron spherule recovered from the Yakovitsa chromitite. (a-c) and (d) are images of the microtexture of
the spherule collected by FE-SEM previously and after polishing, respectively. (e-h) High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission
electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image and corresponding TEM-EDS elemental map of the FIB thin foil (see location in (d)). (i-k)
High-resolution (HR)-TEM and high-magnification HRTEM images of the anatomy of the contact between magnetite microplates and
symplectite amorphous silica. (l) Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) image showing the amorphous nature of the silica sympletitice
and crystallinity of magnetite.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a200722
(2-4 wt.%) as well as Ti and K < 1.5 wt.% (see EDX shrinkage features such as bubble-like vesicles now
inset in Figure 4). These two spherules were partly filled with a suite of secondary minerals including
RESULTS
smashed during the mounting process, reveling magnetite, quartz, rutile or mixtures of them (Figure
internal continuity of the vitreous structure with 4b). Under high magnification magnetite exhibit
the typical conchoidal fractures of glassy materials rounded to octahedral-habit, whereas quartz is pris-
(Figures 4c and 4d). The spherule recovered from matic and rutile is needle-like to acicular crystals
the Golyamo Kamenyane chromitite displays grown perpendicular to the surface of the vesicle.
Figure 3 Microphotographs of the iron spherule recovered from the Golyamo Kamenyane chromitite. (a-b) Secondary electron (SE) FE-
SEM images of the unpolished spherule. (d-f) Representative spectrums of magnetite and wüstite collected micro-RAMAN and FESEM.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a200722
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUDING
4. Discussion and concluding remarks Spherules having structures and textures similar to
4.1. IDENTIFYING SPHERULES IN MANTLE-DERIVED
ours - dendrite magnetite with interstitial silicate
REMARKS
Figure 4 Microphotographs collected by FESEM in SE mode of the glassy spherules recovered from the Yakovitsa (a) and Golyamo
Kamenenyane (b-h) chromitites. Representative FESEM-EDX spectrum of the glass are inset in the figure.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a200722
the wüstite rim (Xu et al., 2015), whereas some In addition, subsequent works showed that SuR-
others from Ray-Iz have iron core with drop-like UHP minerals might also form during low-pres-
REMARKS
inclusions wüstite, Fe–Ti alloys and/or silicate sure partial hydration of oceanic lithosphere
glass with up to 39 wt.% TiO2, 19 wt.% SiO2, 4 (Farré-de-Pablo et al., 2019; Pujol-Solà et al., 2018).
wt.% Al2O3, 22 wt.% FeO, 8 wt.% MnO, 6 wt.% Thus, a need for the inquiry on the generalized
Ca and 1 wt.% K2O (Yang et al., 2015). A subset deep mantle-related origin of for the alleged SuR-
of the spherules identified in-situ in chromites from UHP assemblage has arisen.
Tibet consist of Ni-Fe (formula Ni7.4 Fe2.6; Xu et al., The spherical morphologies along with the
2009) and host inclusions of pentlandite, periclase droplet-like shape of wüstite and/or silicate glass
and magnesium silicates. within iron cores reported in spherules from Ray-Iz
These spherules documented in mantle-de- are consistent with surface tension of unmixing
rived ophiolitic rocks were related to fluids/ metallic, oxide and silicate melts at high-tem-
melts of very high temperature (>1400-1500 ºC) perature. However, such mechanism itself cannot
and low f O2 (well below IW buffer) operating in satisfactorily explain the presence of silicate glass
the lower mantle or the Mantle Transition Zone found as both inclusions within native iron and
(i.e., MTZ > 610 km; Xu et al., 2015; Griffin et interstitial to dendritic magnetite and/or wüstite.
al., 2016). This interpretation was based on two Rather, silicate glass suggests melts quickly frozen
assumptions: (1) the assemblage iron + wüstite (quenched) as these are non-equilibrium materials
was also found in diamonds of deep-seated peri- that form due to fast kinetics preventing complete
dotites and kimberlites (e.g., Xu et al., 2015), and crystallization after melting with extremely high
(2) metallic-silicate-oxide spherules belong to the cooling rates (i.e., in the order of 107 ºC/min for
Super-reducing (SuR) mineral assemblage (e.g., hyper-quenched glasses; McCloy, 2019). There-
moissanite, carbides, nitrides and silicides) that is fore, it is unlikely that those spherules containing
usually found together with minerals that typically glasses were originated in-situ within the Earth’s
form at UHP (e.g., diamond and coesite) in these mantle. In fact, silicate glasses in mantle rocks
mantle rocks. Pioneering works suggested a com- can only be attributed to trapped interstitial melts
mon origin of the SuR and UHP during chromi- that have quenched during fast volcanic eruptions
tite crystallization from high-Cr melts within the (O’Reilly and Griffin, 2012). Interestingly, the
(e.g., Ignimbrites of Southern Primorye in Rusia; that cosmic spherules could remain stable under
Grebennikov, 2011) and G-type cosmic spherules low-temperature and high-pressure conditions
REMARKS
(Folco and Cordier, 2015). A common feature of prevailing upon subduction, and therefore might
all spherules found in ophiolitic mantle rock is that be found in rocks related to slab-derive sediments
both magnetite and wüstite have Ni contents below in subduction zones. Interestingly, some spherules
1.0 wt.%. Low Ni in oxides is a common feature from Ray-Iz exhibit an identical pattern, raising
of cosmic spherules where Ni was separated from the possibility that cosmic spherules (and by exten-
the silicate-oxide melts towards metallic beads sion volcanic ones) now found in peridotites and
due to siderophile attraction display (Genge et al., chromitites from ophiolites could represent part of
2017). In fact, a population of spherules reported sediments that were incorporated into the upper
from Tibetan chromitites still contain Ni-Fe beads mantle via subduction. The recycling of crustal
or are solely Ni-Fe spherules, similarly to the vast material in the mantle and return pathways to
majority of I-type cosmic spherules reported in the the Earth’s surface has been already tracked by
geological record (Folco and Cordier, 2015; Genge xenocrystal zircons inherited from continental
et al., 2017). Nevertheless, cosmogenic nuclide and sources in supra-subduction zone ophiolitic and
noble gas analyses are not available for spherules juvenile intra-oceanic volcanic arc rocks (Proenza
associated with mantle peridotite and chromitites et al., 2018). In this scenario, it is expected that the
to confirm their extraterrestrial or terrestrial ori- spherules had experienced a series of events since
gin. This is clearly a green field for future research. their deposition in the deep sea including: modifi-
Silicate glass spherules from our chromitites cation during fly, alteration during diagenesis and
exhibit some common features with silicate-dom- transport with the oceanic slab into the subduction
inant volcanic and V-type cosmic spherules, zone, high P/T metasomatism/metamorphism,
including: (1) spherical morphology, with smooth heating by carrying fluids and melts involved in
external surface and internal conchoidal fractures mantle metasomatism and chromitite formation,
as is typical for quenched silicate-droplet glass, (2) and final exhumation. However, all the spherules
empty vesicles (now filled with secondary minerals) identified in ophiolitic mantle rocks are well-pre-
that may have been produced by degasification or served as their shapes and chemical composition
dissolution of pre-existing metal beads. However, were not obviously altered. Then, how can these
spherules could be transported and recycled into
Subducted iron and glassy spherules in the upper mantle?
REFERENCES
cold plumes –partly molten crustal (including sed-
iments, continental crust and basalts) and mantle The authors declare no conflict of interest.
rocks mixed on length scales from a few tens of
meters to hundreds of kilometers – contributing
References
to mantle metasomatism and chromitite forma-
tion (González-Jiménez et al., 2017; Proenza et al.,
Agarwal, D.K., Palayil, J.K., 2021, Recovery of
2018). In these two scenarios, the equilibration of
Hydrothermal Wustite-Magnetite Spherules
spherules with surrounding rocks and melts might
from the Central Indian Ridge, Indian
be inhibited by their rapid transfer through frac-
Ocean: Research Square. https://doi.
tures or by porous flow in small melt pockets from
org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-948343/v1
the melting source to a new site in, or their inclu-
Bai, W., Yang, J., Fang, Q., Yan, B., Zhang, Z.,
sion in shielding minerals like pyroxene, olivine
Ren, Y., Shi, N., Ma, Z., Dai, M., 2004, Some
or during melt transport. The incorporation of
native metals from ophiolitic chromitites
such type of inherited xenocrystic pyroxenes and
in Tibet: Earth Science Frontiers (China
olivine have been largely reported in chromitites
University of Geosciences, Beijing), 11 (1),
and melt pockets of peridotites from ophiolites
179-187 (in Chinese with English Abstract).
(e.g., Borisova et al., 2012; Griffin et al., 2016).
Ballhaus, C., Wirth, R., Fonseca, R.O.C.,
Blanchard, H., Pröll, W., Bragagni, A.,
Nagel, T., Schreiber, A., Dittrich, S., Thome,
Contributions of authors V., Hezel, D.C., Below, R., Cieszynski,
H., 2017, Ultra-high pressure and ultra-
JMGJ and IS designed the experiment and car- reduced minerals in ophiolites may form by
ried out the analytical work. JMGJ wrote the lightning strikes: Geochemical Perspectives
manuscript which was revised and intellectually Letters, 5, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.7185/
improved by the input of TNK and FG. geochemlet.1744.
Borisova, A.Y., Ceuleneer, G., Kamenetsky, V.S.,
Arai, S., Béjina, F., Abily, B., Bindeman,
Glasses, in Musgrave, J.D., Hu, J., Calvez, González-Jiménez, J.M., Camprubí, A., Colás,
REFERENCES
L., (eds.), Handbook of glass: New V., Griffin, W.L., Proenza, J.A., O’Reilly,
York, Springer, 771-812. https://doi. S. Y., Centeno-García, E., García-Casco,
org/10.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_22 A., Belousova, E., Talavera, C., Farré-
Colás, V., Fanlo, I., Gervilla, F., González-Jiménez, de- Pablo, J., Satsukawa, T., 2017, The
J.M., Kerestedjian, T., 2013, Compositional recycling of chromitites in ophiolites from
diversity in chromitites from Eastern southwestern North America: Lithos, 294–
Rhodopes (SE Bulgaria): petrogenesis 295, 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
and tectonic implications: Mineralogical lithos.2017.09.020
Magazine, 77 (5), 903. Grebennikov, A., 2011, Silica-metal spherules
Farré-de-Pablo, J., Proenza, J.A., González- in ignimbrites of southern Primorye,
Jiménez, J.M., Garcia-Casco, A., Colás, V., Russia: Journal of Earth Science, 22
Roqué-Rossell, J., Camprubí, A., Sánchez- (1), 20–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
Navas, A., 2019, A shallow origin for s12583-011-0154-0.
diamonds in ophiolitic chromitites: Geology, Griffin, W.L., Afonso, J.C., Belousova, E.A., Gain,
47, 75–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/ S.E., Gong, X.-H., González-Jiménez, J.
G45640.1 M., Howell, D., Huang, J.-X., McGowan,
Folco, L., Cordier, C., 2015, Micrometeorites, N., Pearson, N.J., Satsukawa, T., Shi, R.,
Lee, M.R., Leroux, H., (eds.), Planetary Williams, P., Xiong, Q., Yang, J.-S., Zhang,
mineralogy, Vol. 15: USA, Mineralogical M., O’Reilly, S.Y., 2016, Mantle Recycling:
Society of America, 253–297. Transition Zone Metamorphism of Tibetan
Genareau, K., Wardman, J.B., Wilson, T.M., Ophiolitic Peridotites and its Tectonic
McNutt, S.R., Izbekov, P., 2015, Lightning Implications: Journal of Petrology, 57, 655–
induced volcanic spherules: Geology, 43, 319- 684. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/
322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G36255.1 egw011.
%J Geology Haydoutov, I., Kolcheva, K., Daieva, L., Savov, I.,
Genge, M.J., Engrand, C., Gounelle, M., 2001, Island arc origin of the Neoproterozoic
Taylor, S. 2008, The classification of variegated formations from East Rhodopes
Subducted iron and glassy spherules in the upper mantle?
micrometeorites. Meteoritics and Planetary (Avren Synform and Bela Reka Antiform),
Science: 43, 497-515. http://dx.doi. Bulgaria. EUROPROBE Meeting, METU,
org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb00668.x Ankara, 31–32.
Genge, M.J., Davies, B., Suttle, M.D., van Janák, M., Froitzheim, N., Georgiev, N., Nagel,
Ginneken, M., Tomkins, A.G. 2017, The T.J., Sarov, S., 2011, P-T evolution of kyanite
mineralogy and petrology of I-type cosmic eclogite from the Pirin Mountains (SW
spherules: Implications for their sources, Bulgaria): implications for the Rhodope
origins and identification in sedimentary UHP metamorphic complex: Journal of
rocks: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Metamorphic Geology, 29, 317–332. https://
218, 167-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2010.00920.x
gca.2017.09.004 Kolcheva, K., Haydoutov, I., Daieva, L., 2000,
Gerya, T.V., Yuen, D., 2003, Rayleigh–Taylor Dismembered ultramafic ophiolites from
instabilities from hydration and melting the Avren synform, Eastern Rhodopes:
propel ‘cold plumes’ at subduction zones: Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Petrology, 37,
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 25–38.
212, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/ Kozhoukharov, D., Kozhoukharova, E.,
S0012-821X(03)00265-6 Papanikolaou, D., 1988, Precambrian in
http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2022v74n3a200722
the Rhodope massif, in Zoubek, V. (ed.), W.L., Talavera, C., Rojas-Agramonte, Y.,
REFERENCES
Precambrian in Younger Fold Belts: European Aiglsperger, T., Navarro-Ciurana, D., Pujol-
Variscides, the Carpathians, and Balkans. Solà, N., Gervilla, F., O’Reilly, S.Y., Jacob, D.E.,
International Geological Correlation 2018, Cold plumes trigger contamination of
Programme, Project 22: Chichester, Wiley, oceanic mantle wedges with continental crust-
773–778. derived sediments: Evidence from chromitite
McCloy, J.S., 2019, Frontiers in natural and un- zircon grains of eastern Cuban ophiolites:
natural glasses: An interdisciplinary dialogue Geoscience Frontiers, 9, 1921–1936. https://
and review: Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.12.005
X 4, 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Pujol-Solà, N., Proenza, J., Garcia-Casco, A.,
nocx.2019.100035. González-Jiménez, J., Andreazini, A.,
McGowan, N.M., Griffin, W.L., González- Melgarejo, J., Gervilla, F., 2018, An alternative
Jiménez, J.M., Belousova, E., Afonso, J.C., scenario on the origin of Ultra-High Pressure
Shi, R., McCammon, C.A., Pearson, N.J., (UHP) and Super-Reduced (SuR) minerals in
O’Reilly, S.Y., 2015, Tibetan chromitites: ophiolitic chromitites: A case study from the
Excavating the slab graveyard: Geology, mercedita deposit (Eastern Cuba): Minerals,
43, 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1130/ 8, 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8100433
G36245.1 Pujol-Solà, N., García-Casco, A., Proenza, J.A.,
Niyogi, A., Pat, J.K., Patel, S.C., Panda, D., Patil, González-Jiménez, J.M., del Campo, A.,
S.K., 2011, Anthropogenic and impact Colás, V., Canals, V., Sánchez-Navas,A.,
spherules: morphological similarity and Roqué-Rosell, J., 2020, Diamond forms
chemical distinction a case from India and its during low pressure of oceanic lithosphere:
implications: Journal Earth System Science, Geochemical Perspective Letters, 15, 1-6.
120, 1043-1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/ https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2029
s12040-011-0125-y Robinson, P.T., Bai, W.J., Malpas, J., Yang, J.-S.,
Nyström, J.O., Henríquez, F., Naranjo, J.A., Zhou, M.-F., Fang, Q.-S., Hu, X.-F., Cameron,
Nasuland, H.R., 2016, Magnetite spherules S., Staudigel, H., 2004, Ultra-high pressure
in pyroclasticiron ore at El Laco, Chile: minerals in the Luobusa Ophiolite, Tibet,
Liu, Y.X., Li, G.W., 2011, Spherules with Gondwana Research, 27, 686–700. https://
REFERENCES