This page contains discussions that have been archived from Village pump (technical). Please do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to revive any of these discussions, either start a new thread or use the talk page associated with that topic.
I can't get the new message box ("Scholarship applications for Wikimania 2008 are now open.") to stay hidden. I'm using Firefox, and have all cookies enabled, but though the message disappears when I click hide, it returns when I go to a different page. IE6 seems to be ok. Any suggestions? — Tivedshambo (t/c)08:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, this a bit of vanity, but I've earned it, for once! I have a list of articles on my user page and have spent two days getting an article to Good Article status (my first). I want to include the GA icon, as in {{GA-Class}} in the table, but it messes up, showing the formatting as well. Any ideas how I can do this? Thanks. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 21:12, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
I believe that bigdelete is restricted to the developer group, but the developer group is deprecated and empty. Does this mean that bigdelete is actually unusable on the english wikipedia, and big deletions are carried out manually by the devs using shell/root access?
Which of the following permissions are explicitly revoked when the user is blocked?
I can answer question one. Makesysop and Makebot are still available to be used, and haven't yet been deprecated. Bureaucrats can use either one. Majorly (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/ <-- Look for InitialiseSettings and CommonSettings. Nobody currently has the bigdelete right, and as of yet, nobody has needed it (to my knowledge). In theory, the only action that should be allowed when a person is blocked is self-unblocking. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
From testing on my own wiki, when blocked: block, checkuser, deletedhistory, oversight, hiderevision, userrights, unwatchedpages, mergehistory, deleterevision, renameuser, apihighlimits, nuke, and siteadmin all seem to work when blocked. delete, undelete, markbotedit, review, and stablesettings do not work (Wikimedia doesn't currently use all of these, some are related to the new revision deletion system and flagged revisions) Mr.Z-man21:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
OK, thanks to you both. I never realised that all the wikimedia wikis were configured from the same config files - what a mess!! Thanks for that test, Z-man - I was half tempted to block myself for ten minutes and go on a whistlestop tour of the admin tools, but I didn't really want to impinge on my block log :D. mw:Extension:Nuke has such a cool name, even if it is of questionable utility!! Happy‑melon21:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
You got me :D! I was thinking more of CommonSettings.php, complete with commented-out hacks from 2005 and fragmented manual additions to various black- and white-lists. But then again, you've got much better things to do with your time than tidy a config file that only a handful of non-devs will ever see. Happy‑melon09:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
More questions:
How, if at all, are the "founder" group permissions different to "steward" permissions?
Bureaucrats can grant both sysop and bureaucrat flags, but only stewards can revoke them, right?
Although the chances of it ever happening are remote, if a user was promoted to bureaucrat without first becoming an admin, would they be able to delete/block/protect, etc? My intepretation of the permissions array is not, but I'd like to be certain
The founder group exists because some people on this wiki wanted to give Jimmy some kind of mark of respect in the form of a group assignment, but were in conflict over which exact group that should be. I created the founder group as a compromise. The user rights are arbitrary since he generally gets what he asks for anyway. There's no such thing as a "local founder", Jimmy is a steward on meta and so can desysop people anywhere. -- Tim Starling (talk) 20:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes he did, but you said "local founder can only desysop on the local project they are founder on", a statement which clearly does not apply to Jimmy since he can desysop anyone anywhere. Life is complicated enough without introducing such semantics. -- Tim Starling (talk) 21:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for that clarification. I did notice that the founder group was only assigned on enwiki; I was going to ask about that, but it all makes sense now. Happy‑melon22:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Javascript included from external page
Hello, I want to get an external table editor working. When I included those lines to my monobook.js it worked fine. The thing is that I want to add some individual preferences and so I copied the code from [1] to User:Eneas/edittable.js and changed my monobook.js. The problem is that the script doesn't work anymore with those changes. Could anybody help me please? --Eneas (talk) 12:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Try doing importScript('User:Eneas/edittable.js'); instead. The reason is that it's not raw code (User:Eneas/edittable.js is a HTML page whose contents are a JavaScript script). There's a way to get just the raw code but I've forgotten it. x42bn6TalkMess19:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
It sounds like something surprises you but I don't know what. Do you have a more specific question, for example involving what you see and what you were expecting to see? Maybe it's no longer relevant. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
If the mediawiki search tool wasn't so awful, we'd be quite happy to lock google out of everywhere but the mainspace - it can be done easily with robots.txt - but google is too useful as a search tool at the moment. Happy‑melon14:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
While I understand the desire to keep some pages off of Google, I miss the days when I could search all of Wikipedia via google. The problem was that people were googling their names and finding their AfD(closed as a non-notable garage band) as their first google hit. It could be extended to talk pages, but I would rather it did not as it helps in tracking down things. (1 == 2)Until14:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
How are hyperlinks copy-pasted with images from Wikipedia?
I was wondering if anyone might be able to answer this question I have...
Many-a-time have I copy-pasted images from Wikipedia pages into Microsoft Word. In doing so I have noticed that the images are hyperlinked back to the source location, i.e. if I right-click on the image once pasted in Word and select 'Edit Hyperlink', the address is listed as http:\\upload.wikimedia.org\wikipedia\en\...
What I was wondering is how the images retain the hyperlink, whereas other images I have copy-pasted from the web do not? Any information anyone can give with regards to this would be much appreciated.
I think the answer is the images on Wikipedia already contain hyperlinks, and the images you are copying from other sources do not. After you paste a picture into a Word file, you should be able to remove the Hyperlink; it should be an option when you select "Edit Hyperlink". --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 14:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
New suggested Improvement for the PDF export feature
I understand that Brion has been trying out some extensions for converting articles to PDF files, and the results are looking pretty pleasing. I just want to ask him and other developers to go one step further - is it possible to generate a PDF file from an article and e-mail it straightaway (i.e. a merge of pdf-export and EmailArticle)? This would be a feature especially useful for promoting Wikipedia in China - I understand that the current Internet Censorship conducted by the Chinese Government doesn't include PDF files. If there is a way to generate PDF from articles and e-mail them straightaway it would be a good way to let the Chinese population read the censored articles (e.g. Tibet) through their mailbox, as well as introducing the quality of Wikipedia to them.
I was hoping to make this suggestion on the MediaWiki development site but I couldn't find my way around there. If any developer is reading this I sincerely ask you (ALL of you) to relay this to Brion and consider building (or improving) this Extension!--Computor (talk) 05:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I think that one was already filed and rejected, on the basis that there was too much risk of people vandalising a page and then immediately hitting the email-article link. The odds of encountering a vandalised page are low, but are much higher if you've just vandalised the page deliberately. --ais523 08:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism aside, there's a problem with allowing the wikimedia servers to be used to send e-mail to someone who hasn't opted in to receiving it. --Random832 (contribs) 20:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Indeed, emailing stuff directly out of a user-generated site would be basically an invitation to spam. For this reason, we're very unlikely to add a general 'email this page to a friend' feature; you can always use your own browser's 'Email this page' feature or attach a file on your webmail. --brion (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Removing cell borders in a table
I have been playing around with my user page lately, trying to get a table from one of my user subpages into a NavFrame. The original table looks like this...
But things have gone slightly awry when I tried to place it in a NavFrame, as it became grey and all the cells suddenly developed grey borders. I have managed to get rid of the table border, but not the cell borders. The results so far:
Looks great, just one thing - how come the two "All my accounts" titles aren't quite lined up properly? They both appear to be centered but aren't quite in line. It Is Me Here (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The two "All my accounts" titles aren't lined up because the top one does not center absolutely relative to the width of the table, but relative to the width of the table after subtracting the space for the [hide] button. Nihiltres{t.l}21:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
As you can see if you click "show" above the two "All my accounts" are lined up, thats becauxe I moved I moved it outside (before) the table that makes up the "grid of wikis". MiCkE07:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)