Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 May 2
May 2
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Template:CFBCR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template provides links to the now-defunct College Football Data Warehouse. All links are now dead. Jweiss11 (talk) 20:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The web site to which the template links was long plagued with virus problems and is now defunct. The template needs to go. Cbl62 (talk) 21:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
@Plastikspork:, when SporkBot removes templates like these, what would happen in the case of Robert B. Redman? The template in question here generates the only external link in the external links section of the article. Would SporkBot remove the section heading as well or leave an empty section? Jweiss11 (talk) 21:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Jweiss11, by default, the bot would leave the empty section. However, it is possible to have the empty section removed as well, it just takes more programming. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Plastikspork, it would be great if the empty sections could be removed as well. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 21:58, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, though once a useful site for citation, with the site gone, this template is no longer useful.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
unused and not needed Frietjes (talk) 18:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: No transclusions and unnecessary template. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 18:32, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Jweiss11 (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Mohsen Yeganeh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This is a navigational template for a music artist consists of a bunch of redlink, too few articles to justify a navbox. Mjbmr (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- delete, the albums are already connected through the succession links in the infobox. Frietjes (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Created out of process in 2006, never used, not needed; no corresponding category exists. Her Pegship (talk) 17:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Miner's Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
I updated Miner's Cup to use {{sports rivalry series table}}, so this is no longer needed Frietjes (talk) 16:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, seems appropriate. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Bourgoin rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 15:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- delete per nom, not notable. Frietjes (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Provence rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- delete per nom, not notable. Frietjes (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Tarbes rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 15:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- delete per nom, not notable. Frietjes (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the Birmingham Moseley rugby union team. The majority of the links are redlinks, and would fail to meet rugby union notability criteria. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 15:40, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- delete per nom, not notable. Frietjes (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
The template is a navbox containing players that form part of the London Welsh rugby union team, which folded in December 2016, and released all their players. This template is no longer transcluded from any articles, and no longer valid. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- delete per nom, not notable. Frietjes (talk) 18:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
An awkward sorting template that links to a number of redirects (stations without articles). Removing the redundant redirect links would probably leave not enough articles to link. Raymie (t • c) 08:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- delete, navbox groupings are supposed to be by radio markets, and this isn't one of them. Frietjes (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).