Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Yorkshirian
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Yorkshirian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
CalcioSalvo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
SalvoCalcio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Harkey Lodger (talk) 08:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
Record as CalcioSalvo [1]
Record as SalvoCalcio [2]
Rude and patronising to User:Mattythewhite here to the point of bullying see User talk:CalcioSalvo for block. He made these remarks on Talk:Scarborough Athletic F.C.here
Note the use of the word vertified. and the rudeness.Note also the lack of edit summaries.
His first use of the Yorkshire talk page is here
He has just archiveed the page as of 07:49, 6 May 2008 (UTC).
User:Yorkshirian's first contributions were on 24th October 2007.
His habit of not using edit summaries or using then for terse and rude or threatening messages continued.He started to edit the Yorkshire article then he went back to editing articles he had worked on previously e.g.Robin Hood Yorkshire. He was abrasive with User:Arcayne to whom he sent this message [3] then continued his threats here and edit summaries or lack thereof here
This behaviour has escalated to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Yorkshirian and this [4]
He is using his new identity to repeat his former behavior.
Note the use of the word vertified.
- Comments
Not sockpuppets, names I used before I got this account due to losing the passwords. The last edit on it is 9 September 2007[5], the first edit on this is 24 October 2007.[6] With a period of IP use since in between loosing the password and making a new account. Though Harkey's presentation here is terse, advisary and strongly leanging on personal attacks. She could have just asked me first and I'll gladly have said this and just redirected the accounts with lost passwords to this one. In fact I'll do it now. No use for a check user since it is my orginial account name, which can't be used now thanks to lost passwords. - Yorkshirian (talk) 08:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you comment on your relationship to Yorkshire Phoenix (talk · contribs)? The userpage and contribution history are somewhat comparable to your own. --Jza84 | Talk 15:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Replied here. No YP is not my account. He/she seems to be still editing, as recent as 11 March[7]. The only reason I made this new name last year, was because I lost my old pass word. - Yorkshirian (talk) 17:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
No overlapping edits. No good hand / bad hand editing. No using of accounts to circumvent blocks. In short, no breach of policy. GBT/C 12:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]