Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/November/27
November 27
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was speedy rename
Simple rename to match the usual capitalization rules and its non-stub parent Category:Sport wrestlers. Caerwine Caer’s whines 06:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to speedy this, once the ludicrously-oversized job queue (WTH?) catches up with the recat edit. Alai 18:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete
Bewilderingly titled stub template for... guess. No? This Red Bull Air Race World Series related article is a stub.. No category (it feeds directly into Category:Stubs. No articles, either. Mind you, when you consider that Category:Red Bull Air Race World Series and its one subcat between them have only five articles (and four of them are biographies), and only two of them could be accurately dewscribed as stubs, it's not really suprising. Delete! Grutness...wha? 04:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 06:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Upmerge to {{air-sports-stub}} and delete the existing template. Caerwine Caer’s whines 06:55, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, unaware of another stub category. But please keep. I am making a category for it now.--HamedogTalk|@ 08:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If it were to be kept it would have to be renamed (have a look at the naming guidelines for stub templates. Also the threshold for a stub category is 60 articles - are there 60 articles on this subject? (a clue - there are only five articles on it in total, stub or otherwise, and even if you created separate articles for every pilot who has ever competed in this event, and separate articles for every year it has been competed, your woul have fewer than 20 articles). And as for creating the category... Grutness...wha? 11:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the category mentioned above. No parent listed, stub or otherwise, only one stub article and that's a bio-stub. The creation of the category simply doubles the number of recommended deletions. Grutness...wha? 12:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nothing at all wrong with using Category:Racing sports stubs and Category:Air sports stubs. Alai 17:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Actually, it was used on one article. Valentinian (talk) / (contribs) 23:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Bob 16:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.