Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yoonadue/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Yoonadue

Yoonadue (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

18 June 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

All the three accounts with around 500 edits have significant overlap among each other. They also have a consistent pattern of supporting each other in AfDs and related discussions. In my opinion, there seems to be a tag teaming effort at the least or perhaps I'm imagining things but the degree of overlap compared to overall contributions looks suspicious to me.

Wareon, Ideological arguments? Content dispute? What? In case you are not a sock you should probably read up WP:USTHEM. I could only find one content dispute between us which was a month ago (11:02, 30 May 2020) where your participation was limited to one comment and none with the other two. I'll admit at first I wasn't certain if I should add your name since the overlap wasn't that stark unlike between the other two but you seem to have found (02:24, 22 June 2020) this SPI without being notified right after Azuredivay posts (01:09, 22 June 2020) an SPI. Tayi Arajakate Talk 21:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • So existence of "ideological arguments" shared by 100s of millions people is a valid basis for an SPI? Do you become same person if you edited same page edited by thousands of editors? You need to quit abusing SPI for your content disputes. Wareon (talk) 02:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

20 December 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Dympies was named in an investigation request at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aman.kumar.goel, and was found by checkuser to be operating two undisclosed alternate accounts. The finding led to an arbitration enforcement discussion, the results of which are summarized below. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • As noted, all three accounts are  Confirmed. From the AE discussion the user chose to continue using the Dympies account, and has been placed under a single account restriction and topic ban from WP:ARBIPA, both as arbitration enforcement. The other two accounts have been indefinitely blocked without tags. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]