Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena/Archive

Omkrishnajena

Omkrishnajena (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

08 September 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

Shyamshriya (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
ElusiveTaker (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

either a truly odd coincidence or this is yet another sock farm, see Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

ElusiveTaker is Unrelated. Shyamshriya is a weak Likely, Blocked and tagged. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Postscript: Ishwardaslord (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is definitely them. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:33, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04 January 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Babulaj (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Compare with Shyamshriya (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) rather than the apparent master, and note the fixation with Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena. They appeared after Shyamshriya was blocked. Because the link to the master is indirect I am requesting CU, and also wondering separately about COI/UPE 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Same range, No sleepers immediately visible. Also noting a pattern of ACC creations. Blocked and tagged. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

05 January 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Meghangini (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

SPA recently appeared working on Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena here and on Commons (please let commons know assuming the outcome is as suspected). Loud quacking, but CU because of sudden appearance, please. May be sleepers 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW I have now issued two UPE warnings to this alleged sock, neither of which have elicited a response 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk endorsed - yeah, worth a look. Non-stale in the archives. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 21:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Very Possible bordering on Likely. If not sock, then meat. Blocked and tagged. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21 January 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Makardhwaj (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

A new user complaining about sockpuppets on the talk page of an obscure, declined draft written by sockpuppets, and saying on their user talk page that "when I tried to edit Madhab Chandra Jena draft my account is blocked" and "mere blocking the account forces me to create a new account", which sounds like either direct block evasion, or an IP block. Again also active on Commons. Belbury (talk) 10:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Confirmed to Meghangini. Blocked and tagged, closing. Mz7 (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24 April 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Banditajena1980 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Similar usernames, have both edited the same draft, and used a similar edit summary to other socks ("Minor edit" and earlier in the draft a sock used the summary of "Minor") ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I always request CU just in case it may be needed, even if it may be obvious enough to not be needed. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked and tagged. Seems obvious enough not to require CU. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 00:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15 October 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Banambar (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Per other socks, editing Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena (in a similar style) and moving it prematurely out of draft space. Belbury (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Also created ମାଧବ ଚନ୍ଦ୍ର ଜେନା and spent a great number of edits "perfecting" it. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CU Request made because of the multiple prior cases. Sleeper check please. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:46, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I've deleted and create-protected Madhab Chandra Jena (AfD discussion) and ମାଧବ ଚନ୍ଦ୍ର ଜେନା (AfD discussion) and revoked the editing privileges of Banambar (talk · contribs). There has been a succession of accounts and article re-creations, even in the project namespace and in languages other than English, going back to 2015, alongside create-protections that didn't last. Behaviour alone is quite convincing, here. Uncle G (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed, along with Dhwajmakar1 (talk · contribs). Izno (talk) 20:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- You might want to give the Project:Request an account people a nudge. That will be the 4th time in the past 2 years that the person has simply gone over there and requested a fresh account. Uncle G (talk) 01:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged. Closing. MarioGom (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]