Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jesus on Wheels

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Jesus On Wheels

[edit]

Final (2/15/1) ended 19:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Jesus On Wheels (talk · contribs) – Jesus on Wheels has often been confused with the Willy on wheels vandal and has been blocked several times as a result, "Jesus" could be rewarded with this. Myrtone@Requests for adminship/Jesus on Wheels.com.au 17:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I would like to accept this nomination

Support

  1. Strong Support Jesus On Wheels needs more motivation to edit wikipedia. Myrtone@Requests for adminship/Jesus on Wheels.com.au 14:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. FreddieAgainst Userbox Deletion? 19:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Strong Oppose less then 100 edits, and adminship is given to those who can be trusted with the mop, not as an apology for anything. -Mask 06:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Another strong Oppose - Per AKMask. -- Szvest 17:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up™[reply]
  3. Very Strong Oppose This is almost worth BJAODN-ing. --D-Day(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?) 17:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose: not enough experience at editing. Stephen B Streater 17:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Strong Oppose per above. --Tone 17:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oppose, fails 1FA - Mailer Diablo 17:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Strong Oppose this editor is clearly not ready for adminship based on contributions and his/her deleting of much of this RfA when they acceptedtried to accept the nomination. I suggest a withdrawal by the candidate or closing by a B'crat. Sorry, Gwernol 18:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Strong Oppose... Candidate didn't sign and questions are missing...—G.He 18:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Uhh, what..? dewet|✉ 18:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Speedy oppose Can some crat apply the WP:SNOW rule here? abakharev 18:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Oppose No indication whether or not he will abuse the tools; didn't answer any questions; didn't accept the nomination; less than 100 edits; etc; etc... -→Buchanan-Hermit™/!? 18:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Not to pile on, but 10 main articlespace edits? That's really hard to overlook... -→Buchanan-Hermit™/!? 18:54, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Speedy Oppose per abakharev. Naconkantari 18:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oppose: not enough edits, and a highly dodgy username. -- Karada 18:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Speedy Oppose – if there is such a thing. While I have nothing against this user, they lack sufficient experience for an administrative position with only 62 edits, and the nominator should have been well aware of this. I question why the nomination was made in the first place, in the knowledge that it would certainly fail, and suggest the nominator should refrain from making such nominations in the future – Gurch 18:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. STRONGEST OPPOSE POSSIBLE User was just blocked. I suggest that this RFA end now. DGX 19:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  1. Already has a support... so, no moral support here. -- Jjjsixsix (talk|review)@ 18:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments 

Username	Jesus On Wheels
Total edits	62
Distinct pages edited	42
Average edits/page	1.476
First edit	08:07, July 17, 2005
	
(main)	10
Talk	37
User	5
User talk	7
Image talk	1
Wikipedia	2
—G.He 18:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Jesus_on_Wheels&oldid=1142504726"