Wikipedia:Peer review/B-17 Flying Fortress/archive1
Appearance
I've worked very hard over the past few weeks, referencing and cleaning up this already extensive article. I could use a few unbiased eyes to pick out problems I'm missing, especially POV problems, and other things that will hinder an FAC. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 21:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- You should probably move the quotes to WikiQuote. I believe those would hinder an FAC.--NMajdan•talk 23:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, I think it may even be against policy/guidelines to have quotation sections in articles, but I can't recall the specific policy right now. I think the third quote could be merged into the text as an example/source for the plane's toughness. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 23:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- A lot of the content is lists; some of this should be converted into prose.--HereToHelp 23:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Done. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 21:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- A lot of the content is lists; some of this should be converted into prose.--HereToHelp 23:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, I think it may even be against policy/guidelines to have quotation sections in articles, but I can't recall the specific policy right now. I think the third quote could be merged into the text as an example/source for the plane's toughness. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 23:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)