Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sergow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator:. User:Sergow now indefinitely blocked and the personal attacks both revdel'd and removed. (non-admin closure) ——Serial 11:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure) ——Serial 11:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sergow

Violates WP:POLEMIC. Editors have removed the page's content a number of times, but the user restores it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's extraordinary harassment of me continues. They have taken extreme exception to some grammar fixes I made; they have attacked me, my edits, and everyone who defended my edits. I think their behaviour is genuinely, literally psychopathic. Sergow (talk) 08:50, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this might fall under WP:G10 since it seems to consist of nothing except insults towards people that the user has had disagreements with. 192.76.8.91 (talk) 09:58, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete little more than an attack page, and certainly not conducive to a collegiate forum for collaboration. ——Serial 10:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment from nominator - The user has removed the POLEMIC-violating part of the comment in question, so I withdraw the nomination, leaving behind a run-of-the-mill WP:DIVA exit. Beyond My Ken (talk) 10:25, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (edit conflict) in its current form. I'm sure we can all think of multiple established editors that got mad, edited their user page, retired, and left. The only difference here is that this user is new. They've removed the offending material so I see no reason to censor their experience with the website. We can RevDel the other revisions. Anarchyte (talk • work) 10:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Edit conflict: As BMK has withdrawn the nomination, I've RevDel'd the offending edits leaving only the latest revision. Anarchyte (talk • work) 10:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Anarchyte: The latest revision might not meet the level of revdel (ay, it doesn't), but still contains two outrageous personal attacks. Please remove them also; the optics, by this stage, would not look good were anyone other than an admin do so. Cheers! ——Serial 10:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.