Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Secret Saturdays/Palin unfit for presidency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Image has already been deleted. Bencherlite ^Talk 19:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Secret Saturdays/Palin unfit for presidency

Divisive, and is of no value to the project. See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User page the may be violating Polemic. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Normally a page that exists only to disparage a politician would be speedy deleted as an attack page. User boxes are a sticky issue so MfD makes sense. This is political soapboxing and an attack page on a living person. The image(File:NoSarahPalin.jpg) should be deleted as an attack page too. Most crucially it does nothing at all to improve the encyclopedia. Chillum 18:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User subpage containing a negative userbox creation. Attack page. Soapboxing. Political propoganda. Creator appears to have retired. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete inappropiate misuse of wikipedia, as per the above. John Carter (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:POLEMIC. Sergecross73 msg me 18:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both the userbox and File:NoSarahPalin.jpg. Neither serve any encyclopedic purpose. Also, the picture has a misleading description. It is claimed to be the work of the US government. I very much doubt the US government is in the business of drawing big red diagonal lines through their official works about US politicians. It also omits the "personality rights warning" which exists on the original. In short, it was a bad-faith upload in the first place. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 18:54, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Makes Wikipedia look bad. Delete the file too, possible misuse of personality rights Shii (tock) 20:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Whether or not I agree is irrelevant; this ubx is inappropriate here. Miniapolis 23:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not useful to writing an encyclopedia. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Clear delete; does not help the encyclopaedia so should go. Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 09:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree that it is a pointlessly disruptive polemic. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.