Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 June 30

< June 29	July 1 >

June 30

File:22 website.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, unknown subject Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:300 clarewole.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, WP:NOTHOST Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elizabeth Monroe coin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, much better image at File:Monroe E.jpg B (talk) 02:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AAC LOGO.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, no target article or foreseen encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 03:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HS1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, subject not identified, no encyc use without identification Skier Dude (talk) 03:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it's Joseph Dangerfield. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Houseboat.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, difficult to determine subject because of background clutter; much better images on commons for houseboats Skier Dude (talk) 03:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The houseboats are on the Dal lake in Kashmir, which is famous for them. Added to the article by the uploader in June 2006. [1]; subsequently replaced. Commons has commons:Category:Dal Lake, where it might find a place. Jheald (talk) 02:09, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Houses.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, location not provided, no encyc use, especially w/watermark Skier Dude (talk) 03:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tau Kappa Epsilon's Zeta Mu chapter, at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Don't like the watermark; dubious copyright release; and of questionable broader interest or usefulness. Let's not move this one to Commons. Jheald (talk) 02:19, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T8iUU.ogv

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is not necessary and is replaceable; free media can be donated by the copyright holders. File:DA!_band_photo.jpg may also be outside our WP:NFCC as it is also replaceable in the same way, however it is more necessary to visual the band members, and is lower resolution. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 13:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flaminmamie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non-free image that does not add significantly to article - no need to have a this particular sheet music in the article. whiteman was also active before 1923, so there should be PD sheet music if we really want an image Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This sheet music could be PD if the copyright was not renewed. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 21:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AmazingFalde.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned vanity photo, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 17:31, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rivoniaraid-star.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative non-free newspaper cover used (apparently) just to make the point that a given fact important to the article subject was covered by the press. damiens.rf 19:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that more context is required. The reporting of these arrests was of national, if not international, importance. These arrests resulted in life sentences nearly everyone invoked, inc. Nelson Mandela, and set human rights back 25 years. The police were very pleased with themselves. Looking at it with fresh eyes, Rivonia Trial is probably a better location for the image. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 22:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You say that "The reporting of these arrests was of [great] importance", but then goes on to explain how the arrests themselves were of great importance. We don't use non-free covers of newspapers for every important event we cover in our articles.--damiens.rf 01:25, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Everybody Loves Eric Raymond 2006-02-22, Cancomical Lynchpad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan. Also, although the original source says this comics is released under CC-BY-SA, it includes cropped-photos that most likely probably copyvios/fair uses. damiens.rf 19:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't agree with the unfounded accusation that this includes copyvios, as this was a notably CC comic strip[2], and these chaps are regularly in front of cameras held by free-libre enthusiasts. However the copyright status isn't worth chasing down because Everybody Loves Eric Raymond has since been deleted. The strip preparation was here. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 20:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Those vids 002.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image being used under a claim of fair use depicting the creator of SNL standing next to a bulletin board. There is nothing whatsoever about this image that can't be communicated in text. B (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Adjusting radical clocks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unused extremely low quality (fileformat, artifacts, resolution) mostly text, easily replaceable by File:Radical cyclization substituted.png and actual wiki-text (see Radical clock#Clock rates) DMacks (talk) 20:43, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per nom. --Leyo 21:05, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lewis-Haber.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emanuel school.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User's previous upload was "for Wikipedia use only" (since deleted, invalid license). This may have been intended for use the same way, and even if it wasn't, it is of "web quality" (low quality at a size which would be used on a typical website). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ? The file appears to be properly licensed GFDL 1.2+; and is informatively being used on the relevant article. Tineye isn't finding any matches on the web to indicate any apparent copyvio or licensing fraud; nor does Google Images for '"Emanuel School" Randwick' or '"Emanuel School" Sydney'. I'm not sure what the problem is here, or what gain would be had by removing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jheald (talk • contribs)
- See also my reasoning for the image below; user has a history of (now-deleted) copyvios. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Braude maccabi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, poor quality. Although we can ID the subjects, the uploader has a history of copyvios and other problematic images (most now deleted), and due to the "web quality" of this image, I'm inclined to think that this is another copyvio ("web quality" meaning an image sized for use on a website). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:59, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So the subject is Laurence Braude, and with him is Michael Einfeld. It's true, the image is pretty rubbish. But I'm not finding anything at least with Tineye and Google to confirm for sure that it is a copyvio. Jheald (talk) 17:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, technically speaking, the image has no source listed. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.