Wikipedia:Editor review/Nousernamesleft
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Archiving this request as user did not transclude the request onto the main page and because a considerable amount of time has passed since this request was made. Netalarmtalk 07:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Nousernamesleft (talk · contribs) Hi, I've technically been editing Wikipedia for a year now, but I've really been active only for the past two months; one month if you discount October (which you should, in my opinion). I've started a WikiProject, and am currently in the process of sourcing several articles, but I could probably do my job better if an experienced editor reviewed me. Temperalxy 04:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
I've archived this review. Please see the reason listed above. If you wish to be reviewed, please file a new request and remember to transclude it onto the main Editor review page. Netalarmtalk 07:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I'm rather proud of my extensive work on the backlog of WP:AFC, and tagging almost singlehandedly the articles for the WikiProject I started. Also, I've started two articles about Canadian math competitions which I feel are fairly good for very new articles.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I'm currently in a conflict on this talk page, though technically it's not my conflict; I'm just trying to mediate by sourcing the discussed article.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.