Wikipedia:Editor review/ComputerGuy

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Archiving this request as user did not transclude the request onto the main page and because a considerable amount of time has passed since this request was made. Netalarmtalk 06:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ComputerGuy

ComputerGuy (talk · contribs) I have recently changed my username and as previous reviews show, I am trying to get to admin status ~~asap~~ soon. My previous reviews, 1, 2, and 3 have not gotten many reviews. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 21:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Um, you should not be trying to get admin status ASAP. That shows that you are not ready to be an admin. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry. Mistake. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 23:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've archived this review. Please see the reason listed above. If you wish to be reviewed, please file a new request and remember to transclude it onto the main Editor review page. Netalarmtalk 06:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
Washington State Route 531, Interstate 82, and Washington State Route 527 (all GAs)
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
Nope. None at all.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.