Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaher Saleh
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zaher Saleh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only significant coverage of him I can find is interviews. Not notable. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Palestine, and Ohio. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- The page came about when I was impressed by his film and checked him out. It wasn't the interviews that made me decide to create his Wiki page, but this. Although I don't see what's wrong with using interviews. I suppose there should be some coverage of his success at Star Academy (Arabia) somewhere. There seem to be at least half a dozen people whose Wiki pages are based on their success at that show. --Sobol Sequence (talk) 08:59, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete since subject fails WP:GNG and even WP:NCREATIVE. Of course, "there must be sources" is unfortunately not a strong enough argument. -The Gnome (talk) 15:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.