Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yulecon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:37, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yulecon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage by reliable and independent sources. Esw01407 (talk) 20:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unsouced and lacking in notability. Maybe next year, if the media takes notice. – MrX 02:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails per WP:N. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as having insufficient in-dpeth coverage in independent third party sources to meet WP:GNG. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:28, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No significant coverage by reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:37, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "quite small convention"? = Not notable enough. For more info, see Wikipedia:N. — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.