Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Limit is home

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. L Faraone 03:51, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Limit is home

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book by (now deleted) non-notable author. Rodhull andemu 22:22, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ As Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source, and as Wikipedia is the only g-hit for this book, I would consider it non-notable. There is one outside g-hit for the author - his resume (well, I presume it's his...). This doesn't mention the book. I can't even blame lulu this time - they do get g-hits. Whichever way this has been published, it can't be selling very well - unless there are grave errors in the title and author's name given here. If it were not for the resume, I would have seriously thought there was an error, but that shows the existence of the name in this form. 'Chris Allight' gives a little more - but seemingly no book and nothing that could be considered reliable anyway. I'm almost inclined to go for a speedy as 'hoax'. Peridon (talk) 22:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above two, Sadads (talk) 01:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Self published at www.lulu.com/product/paperback/your-limit-is-home/14266820?productTrackingContext=search_results/search_shelf/center/1, Sadads (talk) 01:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Nice work there. No wonder I couldn't find it - published December 12, 2010 and still doesn't come up on Google over here. Changing to speedy delete as pure spam. Only a book by someone like J.K.Rowling or Prince Charles could achieve notability that soon. (They'd probably be notable before the publication date anyway...) Peridon (talk) 10:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does come up now - with an apparent publicity campaign starting in blogspot and such. Not that there's anything wrong with that - that's how you can get sales. But not on Wikipedia. That's not what we are about. Peridon (talk) 21:08, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.