Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wirgnia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Bielino, Płock County. Daniel (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wirgnia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In re-reviewing articles for NPP I was unable to find any RS to confirm that this place passes our WP:GEOLAND guideline. Lightburst (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I invite yiu to read the first line of WP:GEOLAND that you linked. "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low." Artemis Andromeda (talk) 21:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources seem cited... @Stok _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to Bielino, Płock County, which Wirginia/Wirgnia is part of. The sources cited in the article describe it only as "part of Bielino" (część wsi Bielino) providing no other detail - this is not evidence of being a legally-recognised populated place since this does not list it as a legally-recognised class of populated place, but as part of another. Even if it was WP:NOPAGE has something to say about articles that cannot be developed. On balance I favour deletion over merging because I simply don't believe anyone will credibly be searching for this term and expecting to land on the page for Bielino. "Wirgnia" anyway appears to be a mis-spelling of the original name of Wirginia (the Polish version of "Virginia") which is a first name (see, e.g., Wirginia Maixner). Merging is unnecessary as all the relevant content is already at the article for Bielino (i.e., that Wirginia/Wirgnia is part of Bielino). FOARP (talk) 10:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above, google brings up a map and the page looking through archive cant find anything significant, the article foor Bielinio is quite small and doenst benfit from having this branch. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:27, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. For now I don't see anything that suggests this passes WP:GNG. A merge and redirect seems reasonable, merge being mentioning of the fact that part of the village is named such and such. PS. I nominated this for deletion discussion at pl wiki (pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:10:17:Wirgnia) where I also mentioned our discussion here. Maybe some useful arguments will emerge from there - let's wait another week or so before closing this while checking for any comments there. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Piotrus and FOARP. Ping me if anything comes out of the Polish Wikipedia discussion.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 00:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Piotrus and FOARP as valid AtD. // Timothy :: talk 14:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.