Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Houston (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

William Houston (actor)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable actor with no reliable sources and no evidence of notability Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. Roles in more than a dozen notable films, as well as lead roles in multiple Royal Shakespeare Company productions, certainly constitutes "evidence of notability, and a great deal more. A small truckload of reviews of his stage work alone. There's not a whit of sense behind this effortless nomination. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 17:42, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A Google search found numerous reliable sources. User:Cardiffbear88, I suggest that you do not contribute to Articles for deletion any more, until you become more familiar with research. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.