Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Voyagers
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- We Voyagers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possibly fails on WP:MUSICBIO TheGGoose (talk) 19:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any coverage in reliable sources to show that this band meets WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC. Gongshow talk 20:39, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete PEACOCKy non-notable band spam. no sources. band's myspace page and a blog are the only apparent outside links.Cramyourspam (talk) 14:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.