Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vopolo Havoka, Arizona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. This discussion was one of a large number of disruptive, retaliatory nominations of articles from PogingJuan (see WP:ANI#Disruptive editing/ Harassment by User:PogingJuan), made in such quick succession that they cannot have individually determined that there is a reason for deletion. If there are other editors in good standing that think this article should be deleted, please feel free to open a new discussion. – Joe (talk) 06:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vopolo Havoka, Arizona

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:NGF. Subject lakcs WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. Not an encyclopedic topic. ~Pog ing Juan 05:27, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused about the reasoning for this nom. WP:NGEO says "Legally recognized, populated places are presumed to be notable." Are you say it isn't, in fact, populated? JMWt (talk) 07:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the location on Google Maps. Doesn't look populated to me! It is also not in fact legally recognized. The GNIS is merely a database of names that have appeared on maps and does not constitute legal recognition or verification of what a place really is, so further sources are necessary. Reywas92^Talk 15:42, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they disagreed with an edit I made on one of the articles they created.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:GEOLAND. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. Shellwood (talk) 14:43, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
comment I can barely find reference to this as a Papago/Tohono Oʼodham village. It certainly isn't there now, and apparently hasn't existed since some time in the 1970s. This is really pushing the limits for a settlement's notability. Mangoe (talk) 16:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pima County, Arizona - Does not meet GEOLAND as there is no evidence of legal recognition or significant coverage, however I did find one article which mentions an archaeological site. Since we don't have sourcing that could be used to support the "populated place" description or write anything about this location beyond a stub, a redirect makes the most sense. –dlthewave ☎ 18:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GEOLAND, listed as a village in the Papago Reservation on a publication published by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Indian Affairs. Source added to article. RecycledPixels (talk) 23:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.