Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishhat Mataji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vishhat Mataji

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Need a third party opinion. Lack of references, unclear subject matter, very little text to display (possibly WP:1 SENTENCE) Touch Of Light (talk) 04:11, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I already declined the speedy deleteion of this page as this was some kind of deity rather than a person, so not eligible for A7. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:54, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sources appear to available, Google Scholar, Books, and News have zero results for this. It appears to be irretrievably unverifiable. Also fails WP:N for the same reasons. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 10:57, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Before deleting, sources in the languages used in that area should be checked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:27, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be no source for Devanagari texts (विषहट माताजी, विशत माताजी, बिशत माताजी). ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 12:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as per copyvio of this. I have tagged it for so. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 11:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a Wikipedia mirror, their material is copied from our article, see Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/Stu#TutorGig. I've removed the tag. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 12:18, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Delete There seems to be some links for Vishat Mataji, but it still fails the notability guidelines. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 12:33, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.