Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venn-networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:58, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Venn-networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fixing nomination for IP. Deletion rationale was "Non notable, self-promotion, no sources except author's phd." No opinion from me. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 16:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Have to agree with the IP. Under history: "Venn-networks were proposed by Fernando Buarque during his PhD under supervision of Philippe De Wilde at Imperial College London – University of London – England, in 2002." Under references: "^ Buarque de Lima Neto, F. (2002) (HTM). Modeling Neural Processing Using Venn-networks in Phisiological and Phatological Scenarios (PhD Thesis - Imperial College, London, England). http://dsc.upe.br/~fbln/thesis/index.htm. Retrieved 2006-08-18." In the external links: "Fernando Buarque Research page " And created by? User:Fbln. Fernando Buarque de Lima Neto.--Friendly IP (talk) 17:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Seems interesting, but completely lacks notability. Looks like someone tried to turn their thesis into a Wikipedia article. --NINTENDUDE ⁶⁴ 03:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. remove also Venn network and Venn-network, which redirects to Venn-networks.93.172.17.214 (talk) 12:01, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. You know, if someone's thesis gets covered in reliable sources, and ends up with some notability - fantastic. But that does not appear to be the case here. As for the redirects - as soon as a redirect has its target deleted, a bot will tag it for G8 speedy deletion, and some bored admin will mop it up. No problem. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What is the policy regarding Wikipedia articles in other languages? The same article appears also in Portuguese as: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redes_de_Venn —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.172.44.6 (talk) 23:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We don't directly control other projects, and it's possible that their criteria are different. Sometimes, sources from one project can be used to kick off an article on another project, though. Not being up on my Portuguese, though, I couldn't tell you what the other article means to this one. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.