Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampirates: Dead Deep
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Vampirates. MBisanz talk 01:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Vampirates: Dead Deep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Totally uncyclopedic, not really a part of the Vampirates series, could be merged with Vampirates. TopGearFreak 18:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, it would seem that is one of four articles on the Vampirates series of books (one for each book in the series). There does not seem to be an article for the series at all. I would suggest the creation of a Vampirates (series) article, killing the redirect/disambiguation, and merging the information from all four articles into the series article (with appropriate redirects, of course). I'm not entirely convinced that any of them are notable enough in themselves to warrant an individual article. 74.224.50.124 (talk) 20:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarM 23:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into the Vampirates article. Shoester (talk) 21:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Vampirates links to the first book in the series. Combining all books or even two of them will make infoboxes clash and there's plenty of potential for expansion in all of them that suggests keeping them separate is a good idea. If it ends up being merged, then it should be merged to the book that was released prior to this one. - Mgm|(talk) 23:04, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Vampirates. Article is over 2 years old and is still nothing more than a plot-stub, so it should better be covered in a main article until it's time to WP:SPINOUT. – sgeureka t•c 17:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.