Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unidos Permanecemos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). A merge discussion can continue on an article talk page if desired. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unidos Permanecemos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Does not meet WP:NALBUMS. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Neutral~~ I contested the PROD because I found an AllMusic review right off the bat. However, I have so far not found anything more than some brief mentions, including here and here. But I have a hunch, I'm not exactly sure why, that there is more on this album out there. And also I'd hold AllMusic pretty high up there for clout. Not as much as say Rolling Stone, but I'm hesitant at saying "delete" when AllMusic has reviewed the album. Neutral for now.--¿3family6 _contribs 13:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Hillsong United and/or Con Todo. I'm amending my vote as a pretty exhaustive search has not turned up anything else about this album. I'd suggesting merging some of the content with Hillsong United, and also putting some of the content into a "background" section for Con Todo.--¿3family6 _contribs 18:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 14:36, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.