Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trooth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trooth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician, fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 20:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - appears a long way from passing wp:MusicBio. Not even sure he passes wp:A7 Neonchameleon (talk) 12:21, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete definitely fails WP:MUSICBIO LibStar (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I concur that this does not meet any of the WP:MUSIC notability criteria. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.