Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traffic safety performance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:37, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic safety performance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Partly WP:NOTDIC, partly WP:commonsense, I don't believe this article achieves notability. While a google search does get some hits, they appear mostly to be uses of the phrase. If you think about it, "Traffic safety performance" is a fairly common phrase that could mean many things. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 14:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Note that the creator of the article has created a similar article that has been proposed for speedy deletion. And here's another. Note to the author: it's not personal, and it's great that you're contributing, but these expressions are more suitable for a dictionary than an encyclopaedia. asnac (talk) 15:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User:Fastily has speedy deleted all three. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 20:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.