Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Piper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The primary consensus here is that no participant has a strong opinion on the matter. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Piper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm seeking a discussion on this person, even though I'm neutral. I started to try to improve this, but see there is very little on this person, besides involvement in a well known commercial and viral video. Rob (talk) 17:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inclined towards keep - the references given in the article are sufficient in establishing notability in my opinion. Also the fact that he is still being mentioned after the commercial establishes some further notability. DJAMP4444 (talk) 19:22, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete he doesn't have any significant coverage on him which fails WP:GNG LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: I'm wandering what other editors opinions are of Shoot Magazine's piece. If this is a third-party reliable source, than it helps a lot towards notability, since its substantial coverage about the subject. However, it seems somewhat promotional, and I honestly can't tell whether its a legitimate article, or if it's paid promotional material. --Rob (talk) 23:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Response: It is an article about him but I consider significant coverage multiple articles covering just him. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.