Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Threed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 21:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Threed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable independent sources that can WP:verify notability and provide details that are WP:NOTJUSTPLOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 05:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect as with the other nominations. Marasmusine (talk) 10:32, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. The article would suit better as a mention on the main subject's (Earthbound) article. SwisterTwister talk 04:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The fictional town does not meet the general notability guideline and it is a plot-only description of a fictional work. Like other Earthbound-related articles, all content fails verifiability since it uses unreliable sources and Wikipedia is not a video game guide. Jfgslo (talk) 14:51, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.