Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tax Club (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 19:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- The Tax Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks notable at first glance, but pretty much all the sources are either listings, passing mentions, self-published (i.e. YouTube), or minor human interest stories about the fact that the company President offered the pilot of a crashed plane a ticket to Obama's inauguration. Creator has a COI. Previously deleted at AfD, sources added do not look to be sufficient. Black Kite (t) (c) 17:56, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - advert for a non-notable company. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per G11, spam masquerading as an article. ukexpat (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't agree with G11 deletion because it's not overly promotional, to the point of being unfixable. But I concur with the nomination, the coverage is nowhere near enough to satisfy our notability requirements. There's a long list of citations to sources that are either unreliable or barely mention the company. -- Atama頭 18:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with the above that it's not close enough to previous versions to speedy, but the sources are far too weak to support an article. EyeSerenetalk 11:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.