Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hype Bros

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 20:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Hype Bros

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any notability here. Some far more notable tag teams like the Awesome Truth, Miz and Mizdow, CM Punk and Kofi Kingston, R-truth and Kofi Kingston, Heath Slater and Rhyno, Sasha Banks and Bailey etc, doesn't exist. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 18:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

keep - simply because another article doesn't exist isn't a deletion criteria. Seems notable enough to me. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be no specific notability guidelines in WP:PW. However, these guys did not even win any tag titles or did anything memorable. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 21:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by nominator The lead does not explain why they are notable. Let's ne honest, they have not done anything significant relative to other tag team pages. Just because the team existed doesn't mean it should be kept. It's just too small of a team which should have it's own separate page. All of the stuff is mentioned in the respective wrestlers' talk pages and this page adds nothing different or unique. Not even merging is required because there are no addition content as I've said. THE NEW ImmortalWizard/(chat) 22:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of the article is not what a deletion discussion is for. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:26, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not saying it should be deleted because of bad quality. This page has nothing special and the History section is the same as parts of the careers of Zack Ryder and Mojo Rawley. Like other tag teams, they don't have any major accomplishments or gimmicks, and I don't believe they have notable receptions and significant coverage as a unit. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 13:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

keep - This seems good enough to me, especially since they won a tag team battle royale, and Mojo won the Andre the Giant Memorial Battle Royale at Wrestlemania 33. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.148.156 (talk • contribs)
Delete Other stuff doesn’t exist isn’t deletion criteria, but I still don’t see general notability met here. Trillfendi (talk) 21:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:12, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.