Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa Kruze

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Kruze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local news personality. Madg2011 (talk) 23:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Madg2011 (talk) 23:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Madg2011 (talk) 23:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Madg2011 (talk) 23:37, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 08:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Journalists are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist; the notability test for a journalist is evidence of distinctions, such as winning a top-level national journalism award and/or clearing WP:GNG on substantive reliable source coverage about her. But nothing like what's necessary is shown here, and this is written far more like an advertorialized résumé than an encyclopedia article — which is a type of article that even journalists who do clear our notability standards for journalists still don't get to keep. To be fair, she's got a decade-plus at TSN under her belt, so she isn't a purely local television personality — but even national television personalities still don't get exempted from having to have reliable source coverage. Bearcat (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete on account of lack of sources supporting notability per WP:AUTHOR or WP:JOURNALIST, which posit the same criteria, really. -The Gnome (talk) 10:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.