Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Committee on VLSI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to IEEE Computer Society. (non-admin closure) Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 20:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technical Committee on VLSI

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What makes this committee pass WP:NORG? Ping Fayenatic london who PRODDED it (only for the prod to be removed with no rationale by another editor). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:04, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:40, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/merge The IEEE is a large and respectable professional body. The worst case for this topic would be merger to a page such as IEEE_Computer_Society#Technical_committees per WP:ATD-M. Deletion is therefore not appropriate and the rest is a matter of ordinary editing per WP:NOTCLEANUP. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ITSIMPORTANT is not a particularly good article. Important according to whom? Committees are rarely notable and the sourcing here proves this - nobody discusses the body outside IEEE. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge There needs to be more independant reliable sources to show coverage of this to warrant a standalone article. Most of the sources don't seem to be independant. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. For a discussion following the PROD in April, see User_talk:Fayenatic_london/Archive23#ieee_societies_proposed_for_deletion. In April 2020‎ I improved the page somewhat but tagged it for notability, as the article fails to assert compliance with WP:ORG. In May, Quick2011wiki (talk · contribs) removed the tag, stating "This wikipage page presents information of a sub-unit of IEEE Computer Society that sponsors 10 IEEE-CS conferences. This is one stop information page for VLSI/hardware researchers." That does not address WP:ORG; what he wrote is true, but that's the function of TC VLSI's own website, not a general purpose encyclopaedia. – Fayenatic London 09:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.