Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasnim Mir (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is GNG is not met. No objection to draft space incubation should Mir eventually make the Olympics, but should not be restored absent significant, in depth sourcing. Star Mississippi 01:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tasnim Mir

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON case. The entity is yet not ready for main article. Hence calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:12, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets criterion #5 of WP:NBAD, as she has one some Gold medals and may qualify for Olympics as a result. Caphadouk (talk) 10:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a difference between; already participated in Olympics, being qualified for Olympics and may qualify for Olympics. And she is yet to participate in any top BWF Super Series or BWF Grand Prix. As of now, the entity clearly fails Notability Sports - Badmintion. -Hatchens (talk) 15:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON, and the medals were not in a national championship, only an age-category championship. Geschichte (talk) 08:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets criteria number one of WP:NBAD as she is the participant at the World Women's team Championships (Uber Cup) in 2021. zoglophie 10:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as obviously TOOSOON and lacking SIGCOV. NSPORT requires GNG be met, so meeting NBAD is irrelevant. JoelleJay (talk) 18:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets criteria number one of WP:NBAD as she is the participant at the World Women's team Championships (Uber Cup) in 2021. --Florentyna (talk) 15:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Florentyna @Zoglophie @Caphadouk NBAD simply predicts which badminton players are likely to meet GNG, and like all sport-specific guidelines under NSPORT it still requires GNG to be met. JoelleJay (talk) 21:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep , and please not too much unlinked abbreviations and more details, what is not met. Google: 137.000 results searching for "Tasnim Mir". For comparison: Today created article Cameron Hanekom 674 hits. --Florentyna (talk) 20:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Florentyna, you cannot !vote twice, so you should remove the second !vote. As for the unlinked abbreviations, WP:GNG is the general notability guideline that is required for almost all biographies on Wikipedia. WP:NBAD (which you linked) is on the WP:NSPORT page, the first sentence of which says This guideline is used to help evaluate whether or not a sports person or sports league/organization (amateur or professional) is likely to meet the general notability guideline, and thus merit an article in Wikipedia. At the top of the page there is a collapsed section with FAQs; 1, 2, and 5 directly state GNG must be met for athletes. I will also note Google hits are not a useful metric for Wikipedia notability and are in fact listed as an argument to avoid in AfD discussions. JoelleJay (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.