Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamer Mol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. StarM 03:38, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tamer Mol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable footballer, yet to play in an all-fully-professional competition and therefore fails to meet WP:ATHLETE Mattinbgn\talk 08:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 08:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Has not played in a professional league or even at the highest level in amateur sports, so therefore fails to meet WP:ATHLETE. ThePointblank (talk) 08:05, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nominator's rationale (and heck I even support the Northern Bullants but sorry he is not worthy of an article as yet).--VS talk 08:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable per WP:ATHLETE. WWGB (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Amateur sportsman; clearly fails WP:ATHLETE Murtoa (talk) 11:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is no evidence that subject passes any notability guidelines, particularly WP:ATHLETE which of all notability criteria, has the lowest requirements.--Boffob (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.