Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taj Varzeshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 02:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taj Varzeshi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Notability (media). IamMM (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:28, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 19:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above Dr Salvus 19:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems like a historical magazine that passes GNG, and the references are solid enough.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article doesn't pass WP:GNG. so it should delete. Iamfarzan (talk) 03:25, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Historic magazine which at his time had value and importance Mardetanha (talk) 12:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I AGREE WITH THE COMMENT ABOVE ME Esaïe Prickett (talk) 19:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability. Digged in deep on GBOOKS and nothing either. Fails WP:N Riteboke (talk) 08:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - in line with WP:NMEDIA, I could find no evidence of a significant award, serving a historic purpose, being authoritative or influential, being frequently cited or being a significant publication in a niche market (it perhaps comes close to fulfilling the last one) but due to the complete lack of available sourcing, it's hard to support a keep argument and, ultimately fails GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:18, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.