Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2032 Summer Olympics (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TBD 2032)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- TBD 2032 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previous AfDs for this article:
Way too early Shadowjams (talk) 08:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Travelbird (talk) 08:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The event will only occur after 22 years. A definite case of Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. JIP | Talk 09:31, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this merits no more than a sentence in another entry, not an entire article. Hairhorn (talk) 12:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per above, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 12:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Despite what's been assembled here, this is very nearly the definition of WP:CRYSTAL. Serpent's Choice (talk) 13:13, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Armbrust Talk Contribs 23:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- SNOW delete for all the above reasons. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This is the sort of article that Wp:BALL was intended to prevent being created. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 13:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete (G4) as recreation of deleted material via an AFD. Nothing new has been brought forward between now and then. –MuZemike 03:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.