Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synder App

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Synder App

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed through NPP. Promotional article on a software package sourced to random no-name websites and primary sources, nothing better to be found through WP:BEFORE. See also CloudBusiness. Spicy (talk) 10:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 10:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spicy (talk) 10:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:35, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom —{Cryptic Canadian} 01:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep taken down primary sources, now article only covers important integrations with major US payment and accounting platforms (Stripe, PayPal, Xero, QuickBooks, Square). Hoping it can stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seabreeze44 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 11:28, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Entirely generic payments app, one amongst dozens upon dozens. Nothing stands out as being notable. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 15:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.