Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swetang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Normally, I would go along with pretty much any idea for a redirect, but there are some strong arguments put forth why a redirect would be wrong, so just plain delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:05, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Swetang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since PROD was removed by anon, nominating here. Questable notability ~~of not so popular epithet of Ganesha~~ Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Though the article claims it to be an epithet, found no proof of it. It however can be used as a generic epithet for fair-complexioned deities. (see below) --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ganesha. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since this is not a common attribute of Ganesha, I suggest deletion. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection does no harm whatsoever. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection intimates that this is a phrase that may be commonly searched. It gives weight to the assumption that this phrase is moderately common in usage. If that is not the case we need to acknowledge that and delete the article. Padillah (talk) 20:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. It intimates no such thing. It merely helps anyone who may be searching for Swetang. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Ganesha as this article relates to just that, Completely agree with Necrothesp redirecting does no harm at all. –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Although WP:REDIRECTSARECHEAP, we need to see that the word Swetang and its spelling variations are somewhere covered in the target article. Now Ganesha has tons of different names and redirecting them all and mentioning them all there would only create mess. @Redtigerxyz:, does the name come in Ganesha Sahasranama or Ganesha Purana. Although currently the Sahasranama article doesnt show all names, someday those 1000 names will have to be included in it like the Vishnu sahasranama has. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:11, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This doesn't feature in either the Ganesh Ashtotra (108 names) or in the Sahasarnama (1008 names), so it's not even 1007th on the priority list for redirects. Besides, it is used to refer to Ganesha only in the adjectival form and not as a noun, and even that isn't common within major literature and this usage is also quite varied in references. A redirect does far more disservice to readers here by implying something that isn't the case. —SpacemanSpiff 04:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:06, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dharmadhyaksha, Swetang (श्वेतांग; literally "white-bodied") does not figure in the names of Ganesha. [1] says it is an epithet of Balarama. [2] In feminine form, it applies to Devi. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you and SS now. Its more of adjective than noun and has been used to describe various gods; Shiva in this example. So delete it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:39, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.