Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Khanna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subhash Khanna

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hugely problematic article - created by editor blocked for UPE, consists of sweeping assertions not backed by citations - for instance, the article cited to explain his presidency of the Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endosurgeons is actually titled "This Nagaland village council has decided to not pay 'taxes' till underground groups unite" - that presidency is confirmed in another source - cited to source his BC Roy Award, but which does not even mention that award. WP:GNG is failed by the other passing mentions, incidental coverage and excessive irrelevance in this article. He's a surgeon, he's not notable. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and India. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unreliable, un-related sources and UPE, all are problems. Oaktree b (talk) 16:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject is middle author on a couple of highly-cited, highly-coauthored papers. I'm not seeing a pass of WP:NPROF C1. The journal editorship is of a new journal [1], which does not pass WP:NPROF C8. Little other sign of notability, and WP:TNT is relevant. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 16:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: WP:PROMO, Lack of WP:RS and WP:GNG thanks QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 05:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Assam-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:30, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Congrats! This is the first AfD in a new delsort! –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.